Table 4.
Univariate and Multivariate logistic regression analysis of EOGC and LOGC patients from our hospital for metastasis
| Variables | Univariate analysis | P value | Multivariate analysis | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Male | Reference | – | ||
| Female | 0.846(0.425–1.686) | 0.635 | ||
| Age | ||||
| ≤ 45 | Reference | – | Reference | – |
| > 45 | 0.395(0.185–0.84) | 0.016 | 0.301(0.135–0.672) | 0.003 |
| Hypertension | ||||
| No | Reference | – | ||
| Yes | 1.165(0.465–2.918) | 0.745 | ||
| Diabetes | ||||
| No | Reference | – | ||
| Yes | 1.506(0.594–3.819) | 0.389 | ||
| Smoke | ||||
| Never | Reference | – | Reference | – |
| Yes | 2.177(1.142–4.152) | 0.018 | 2.768(1.355–5.657) | 0.005 |
| Primary site | ||||
| Cardia | Reference | – | ||
| Fundus | – | – | ||
| Antrum | 0.807(0.097–6.741) | 0.843 | ||
| Body | 1.412(0.164–12.121) | 0.753 | ||
| Overlappping/NOS | ||||
| T stage | ||||
| T1 | Reference | – | Reference | – |
| T2 | 4.102(0.794–21.193) | 0.092 | 3.377(0.584–19.536) | 0.174 |
| T3 | 5.211(1.035–26.233) | 0.045 | 2.141(0.312–14.684) | 0.438 |
| T4 | 4.714(1.094–20.317) | 0.038 | 1.873(1.327–12.112) | 0.047 |
| N stage | ||||
| N0 | Reference | – | Reference | – |
| N1 | 1.819(0.603–5.493) | 0.288 | 1.028(0.306–3.458) | 0.964 |
| N2 | 2.719(0.651–4.726) | 0.266 | 1.085(0.361–3.262) | 0.884 |
| N3 | 6.564(1.519–8.526) | 0.004 | 2.102(1.064–5.858) | 0.035 |
| Lesion classification | ||||
| Infiltration type | Reference | – | ||
| Ulcerative type | 0.601(0.194–1.86) | 0.377 | ||
| Protuberant type | 0.408(0.093–1.794) | 0.235 | ||
| Lymphatic vessel invasion | ||||
| No | Reference | – | Reference | – |
| Yes | 4.232(1.91–9.374) | 0.000 | 3.294(1.771–9.268) | 0.024 |
| Tumor size | ||||
| ≤ 2 cm | Reference | – | ||
| ≤ 5 cm | 0.259(0.734–6.952) | 0.155 | ||
| > 5 cm | 2.965(0.986–8.917) | 0.053 | ||
| Examined LNs | ||||
| ≤ 16 | Reference | – | ||
| > 16 | 0.595(0.269–1.317) | 0.2 |