Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 1;14(5):415–420. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.200154

Table 3.

Within and between group comparisons of change in knee variables (degrees)

ADFH (N = 25 limbs) ADFH/PTS (N = 17 limbs) Change between groups
Pre mean (sd) Post mean (sd) Change (sd) p-value for change* Pre mean (sd) Post mean (sd) Change (sd) p-value for change* p-value unadjusted* p-value adjusted*,** 95% Confidence Interval adjusted**
Popliteal angle (degrees) 51 (13) 39 (13) −12 (11) < 0.001 62 (10) 38 (9) −24 (12) < 0.001 0.005 0.31 −14.1 to 4.5
Knee extension ROM (degrees) −13 (5) −5 (7) 8 (7) < 0.001 −19 (8) −4 (7) 15 (9) < 0.001 0.03 0.19 −2.2 to 11.6
Maximum knee extension stance (degrees) −31 (9) −15 (18) 16 (17) < 0.001 −51 (16) −17 (14) 34 (19) < 0.001 0.01 0.53 −10.7 to 21.0
GDI 68 (9) 74 (11) 6 (8) < 0.001 59 (12) 73 (11) 13 (12) < 0.001 0.05 0.54 −6.1 to 11.6
Rate of change in knee extension ROM (degrees/month) 0.52 (0.37) 1.02 (0.71) 0.02 0.27 −0.18 to 0.63

ADFH, anterior distal femoral hemiepiphysiodesis; GDI, Gait Deviation Index; PTS, patellar tendon shortening surgery; ROM, range of motion; PTS, patellar tendon shortening

*

Linear mixed model

**

Adjusted analysis controls for preoperative popliteal angle, knee extension ROM and maximum knee extension in stance