Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 29;11(6):1583–1602. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa073

TABLE 1.

Study design and protocol characteristics of the included RCTs investigating the effects of ketogenic therapy on patients with mild cognitive impairment/Alzheimer disease1

First author Brandt (45) Craft (46) Fortier (47) Henderson (48) Henderson (49) Krikorian (50) Ota (51)2 Rebello (52) Reger (53) Torosyan (54)
Study name BEAM BENEFIC
Study duration October 2015 to April 2018 February 2015 to April 2017 2015 until now October 2004 to June 2006 October 2004 to June 2006 NR October 2012 to August 2013 NR NR
Publication year 2019 2016 2019 2009 2011 2012 2019 2015 2004 2018
Publication type Full-text Abstract Full-text Full-text Full-text Full-text Full-text Commentary Brief communication Full-text
Journal J Alzheimers Dis Alzheimers Dement Alzheimers Dement Nutr Metab BMC Med Genet Neurobiol Aging Neurosci Lett BBA Clin Neurobiol Aging Exp Gerontol
Origin USA USA Canada USA USA USA Japan USA USA USA
Registry NCT02521818 NCT02984540 NCT02551419 NCT00142805 NCT00142805 NCT00777010 NR NCT01669200 NR NR
Funding 1) William & Ella Owens Medical Research Fndn2) Bright Focus Fndn3) NCATS4) Hass Avocado Board 1) Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center2) NIA3) Hartman Family Fndn4) Dept of Defense5) NCATS 1) Part-the-Cloud, AA, USA2) Mitacs3) Université de Sher-brooke Accera, Inc. Accera, Inc. 1) Robert C & Veronica Atkins Fndn2) NIA3) Indiana AD Center 1) Food Science Institute Fndn, Japan2) Meiji Co. Ltd. NR NR 1) John Douglas French AD Fndn 2) Accera, Inc.
Ethical permission Johns Hopkins University, USA Wake Forest School of Medicine, USA CIUSSS de l'Estrie–CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada Essex Institutional Review Board, Lebanon, NJ, USA Essex Institutional Review Board, Lebanon, NJ, USA University of Cincinnati, USA National Center of Neurology & Psychiatry, Japan Pennington Biomedical Research Center, USA NR NR
RCT design Parallel Crossover Parallel Parallel Parallel Parallel Crossover Parallel Crossover Parallel
Randomization Random number table NR Randomization sequence with 6 consecutive blocks of 10 participants (1:1 ratio) Permutated block randomization code with a block size of 4 (1:1 ratio) NR NR Randomized sequence NOD Random number table NOD NR By the pharmacy, NOD
Masking Single-blind Single-blind (outcomes assessor) Quadruple-blind Double-blind Double-blind Open label Double-blind Double-blind Double-blind Double-blind
Multicenter No No No ✓ (23 centers) ✓ (23 centers) No No No No No
Concerns No flowchart, discrepancies between PP analysis and reported dropouts More outcomes were reported in the protocol registry, lack of flowchart, no tables Lack of flowchart, most data presented in figures Patients at each stage were not reported, no flowchart, lack of RCT protocol registry Very low sample power, lack of statistical analyses and flowchart Lack of flowchart, data presented in figures Uneven sample allocation, no flowchart, low sample power in controls
Oxford quality score (44) 2 −1 2 3 3 −1 0 1 0 2
1

AA, Alzheimer's Association; AD, Alzheimer Disease; BEAM, Brain Energy and Memory; BENEFIC, Brain ENErgy Fitness, Imaging and Cognition; CIUSSS de l'Estrie–CHUS: Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Estrie–Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke; Dept, Department; Fndn, Foundation; NCATS, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; NIA, National Institute of Aging; NOD, not other defined; NR, not reported; PP, per protocol; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

2

The study had a double design: an RCT (presented in the table) and a long-term clinical trial without a comparator (omitted for not fulfilling the inclusion criteria).