Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 15;11(6):1437–1452. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa077

TABLE 1.

Summary of individual effect sizes from original meta-analyses of the associations on tea consumption and risk of cancer included in the study

Category Number of effect sizes Comparison details, % n
Total 154 100.0
By exposure (tea type)
 Any tea 78 50.7 38 Any vs. none 32 High vs. low 8 Increment of 1–3 cups/d
 Black tea 19 12.3 5 Any vs. none 11 High vs. low 3 Increment of 1–2 cups/d
 Green tea 57 37.0 12 Any vs. none 41 High vs. low 4 Increment of 1–2 cups/d
By study type
 Case-control 25 16.2
 Cohort 24 15.6
 Observational (combined) 105 68.2
By cancer type
 Biliary tract cancer 1 0.6
 Bladder cancer 7 4.5
 Brain cancer 3 1.9
 Breast cancer 31 20.1
 Colorectal cancer 8 5.2
 Colon cancer 1 0.6
 Rectal cancer 1 0.6
 Endometrial cancer 11 7.1
 Esophageal cancer 6 3.9
 Gastric cancer 17 11.0
 Gallbladder cancer 2 1.3
 Glioma 2 1.3
 Renal cell carcinoma 1 0.6
 Liver cancer 4 2.6
 Lung cancer 5 3.2
 Leukemia (childhood) 8 5.2
 Leukemia (adult) 2 1.3
 Ovarian cancer 12 7.8
 Laryngeal cancer 5 3.2
 Oral cancer 7 4.5
 Oropharyngeal cancer 3 1.9
 Pharyngeal cancer 3 1.9
 Pancreatic cancer 5 3.2
 Prostate cancer 7 4.5
 Thyroid cancer 1 0.6
 Skin cancer (nonmelanoma) 1 0.6
By level of evidence
 Convincing 2 1.3
 Suggestive 16 10.4
 Weak 25 16.2
 Nonsignificant 107 69.5
 Not adequately assessed 4 2.6