Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 15;11(6):1437–1452. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa077

TABLE 2.

The results and the level of evidence of the effect of tea and risk of cancer1

Outcome Study type Comparison Type of tea P value (random-effects)2 95% PI including null Heterogeneity (I2)2 Effect-size distribution (D/N/I)3 Small study effect4 Concordance Metrics Summary effect (random-effects)5
Associations supported by convincing evidence
 Oral cancer CC Any vs. none Any tea <10−6 No Not large 6/0/0 No Yes OR 0.62 (0.55, 0.72)
Associations supported by suggestive evidence
 Biliary tract cancer Obs Any vs. none Any tea <0.05 but >10−6 Yes Not large 4/4/0 No Yes RR 0.77 (0.64, 0.92)
 Breast cancer CC High vs. low Green tea <0.05 but >10−6 Yes Large6 6/5/0 No Yes RR 0.75 (0.61, 0.92)
 Endometrial cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea <0.05 but >10−6 Yes Not large 2/4/0 No Yes RR 0.78 (0.61, 1.00)7
 Liver cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea <0.05 but >10−6 Yes Not large 2/9/0 No No RR 0.87 (0.78, 0.98)
 Oral cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea <0.05 but >10−6 Yes Not large 1/4/0 No No RR 0.82 (0.69, 0.96)
 Oral cancer Obs High vs. low Any tea <0.05 but >10−6 No Not large 5/26/0 No Yes RR 0.86 (0.80, 0.91)
Associations supported by weak evidence
 Breast cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea <0.05 but >10−6 Yes Large 6/10/0 No No RR 0.82 (0.71, 0.96)
 Breast cancer Obs Any vs. none Green tea <0.05 but >10−6 Yes Large 3/11/0 No Yes OR 0.87 (0.76, 0.99)
 Breast cancer Obs Any vs. none Any tea <0.05 but >10−6 Yes Very large 6/20/0 No No RR 0.81 (0.71, 0.94)
 Colorectal cancer Obs High vs. low Any tea <0.05 but >10−6 Yes Not large 6/45/2 Yes No RR 0.93 (0.87, 0.99)
 Colorectal cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea <0.05 but >10−6 Yes Large 4/11/0 No No RR 0.87 (0.75, 1.00)7
 Gastric cancer Obs Any vs. none Any tea <0.001 Yes Very large 23/30/3 Yes No RR 0.78 (0.70, 0.86)
 Leukemia Obs High vs. low Any tea <0.001 No Not large 4/4/0 Yes No RR 0.55 (0.43, 0.72)
 Leukemia Obs Any vs. none Any tea <0.05 but >10−6 No Not large 1/7/0 Yes No RR 0.76 (0.65, 0.89)
 Liver cancer Obs Any vs. none Green tea <0.05 but >10−6 Yes Large 3/7/0 No No RR 0.65 (0.48, 0.88)
 Lung cancer Obs Any vs. none Any tea <0.001 Yes Very large 18/24/1 No Yes RR 0.76 (0.67, 0.86)
 Ovarian cancer Obs Any vs. none Any tea <0.05 but >10−6 Yes Very large 8/22/1 No No RR 0.82 (0.71, 0.94)
 Thyroid cancer Obs High vs. low Any tea <0.05 but >10−6 Yes Not large 1/13/0 Yes No RR 0.77 (0.61, 0.97)
Nonsignificant associations
 Acute leukemia (childhood) Obs High vs. low Any tea >0.05 Yes Not large 0/8/1 No Yes RR 0.93 (0.74, 1.18)
 Acute leukemia (childhood) Obs Any vs. none Any tea >0.05 Yes Not large 0/14/0 No No RR 0.93 (0.82, 1.05)
 Bladder cancer CC High vs. low Any tea >0.05 Yes Large 1/22/2 No Yes RR 0.97 (0.87, 1.09)
 Bladder cancer Obs High vs. low Any tea >0.05 Yes Large 2/29/2 No Yes RR 0.95 (0.86, 1.06)
 Bladder cancer Co High vs. low Any tea >0.05 Yes Large 1/7/0 No Yes RR 0.86 (0.65, 1.13)
 Bladder cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea >0.05 Yes Not large 0/5/0 No Yes RR 1.03 (0.82, 1.31)
 Brain cancer Obs Any vs. none Any tea >0.05 Yes Not large 2/6/0 No No RR 0.90 (0.74, 1.09)
 Breast cancer Co High vs. low Black tea >0.05 Yes Not large 0/15/0 No No RR 1.04 (0.97, 1.12)
 Breast cancer CC High vs. low Black tea >0.05 Yes Large 1/12/0 No No RR 0.91 (0.80, 1.03)
 Breast cancer Obs High vs. low Black tea >0.05 Yes Large 1/27/0 No Yes RR 0.98 (0.91, 1.06)
 Breast cancer Co High vs. low Green tea >0.05 Yes Not large 0/5/0 No Yes RR 0.99 (0.83, 1.77)
 Breast cancer Co Any vs. none Green tea >0.05 Yes Not large 0/9/0 No Yes OR 0.94 (0.83, 1.05)
 Breast cancer CC Any vs. none Green tea >0.05 Yes Very large 3/2/0 No No OR 0.83 (0.62, 1.10)
 Breast cancer Co High vs. low Any tea >0.05 Yes Not large 0/12/2 No Yes RR 1.03 (0.96, 1.10)
 Breast cancer CC High vs. low Any tea >0.05 Yes Large 1/8/0 No Yes OR 0.90 (0.75, 1.10)
 Breast cancer Obs High vs. low Any tea >0.05 Yes Large 1/20/2 No Yes RR 0.98 (0.90, 1.06)
 Colon cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea >0.05 Yes Not large 1/9/1 Yes Yes RR 0.98 (0.85, 1.12)
 Colorectal cancer Obs High vs. low Black tea >0.05 Yes Large 2/14/4 No Yes RR 0.99 (0.87, 1.13)
 Endometrial cancer Obs High vs. low Any tea >0.05 Yes Large 3/12/1 Yes Yes RR 0.90 (0.75, 1.09)
 Endometrial cancer Obs Increment of 1cup/d Any tea >0.05 Yes Large 0/4/1 No Yes RR 1.04 (0.98, 1.10)
 Endometrial cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea >0.05 Yes Large 1/8/1 No No RR 0.99 (0.79, 1.23)
 Esophageal cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea >0.05 Yes Large 9/11/2 No Yes RR 0.81 (0.62, 1.06)
 Gallbladder cancer Obs High vs. low Any tea >0.05 Yes Very large 2/2/0 No No RR 0.57 (0.25, 1.30)
 Gallbladder cancer Obs Any vs. none Any tea >0.05 Yes Very large 3/3/0 No No RR 0.67 (0.40, 1.12)
 Gastric cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea >0.05 Yes Large 3/25/2 Yes Yes RR 0.93 (0.84, 1.04)
 Gastric cancer Obs High vs. low Black tea >0.05 Yes Not large 0/4/1 No Yes RR 1.18 (0.79, 1.77)
 Gastric cancer Obs Increment of 3cups/d Any tea >0.05 Yes Not large 0/5/0 No Yes RR 0.98 (0.89, 1.08)
 Glioma Obs Any vs. none Any tea >0.05 Yes Very large 0/4/0 No No RR 0.67 (0.40, 1.12)
 Glioma Obs High vs. low Any tea >0.05 Yes Very large 1/3/0 No No RR 0.57 (0.25, 1.30)
 Laryngeal cancer Obs High vs. low Any tea >0.05 Yes Large 2/5/1 No Yes RR 0.91 (0.67, 1.23)
 Liver cancer Obs Any vs. none Any tea >0.05 Yes Very large 3/9/0 No No RR 0.77 (0.57, 1.03)
 Lung cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea >0.05 Yes Very large 4/7/1 No Yes RR 0.78 (0.61, 1.01)
 Lung cancer Obs High vs. low Black tea >0.05 Yes Large 4/10/0 No Yes RR 0.86 (0.70, 1.05)
 Oropharyngeal cancer Obs Any vs. none Any tea >0.05 Yes Large 2/4/0 No Yes RR 0.68 (0.45, 1.03)
 Ovarian cancer Obs Any vs. none Green tea >0.05 Yes Very large 3/5/1 No Yes RR 0.76 (0.57, 1.02)
 Ovarian cancer Obs Any vs. none Black tea >0.05 Yes Large 4/12/0 Yes Yes RR 0.90 (0.78, 1.04)
 Pancreatic cancer Obs High vs. low Any tea >0.05 Yes Not large 1/20/1 No Yes RR 0.97 (0.85, 1.10)
 Pancreatic cancer Obs Any vs. none Any tea >0.05 Yes Large 2/25/2 No Yes RR 0.99 (0.89, 1.10)
 Pancreatic cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea >0.05 Yes Large 1/6/1 No Yes RR 0.99 (0.78, 1.25)
 Pharyngeal cancer Obs Any vs. none Any tea >0.05 Yes Not large 0/4/0 No Yes RR 0.88 (0.74, 1.04)
 Prostate cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea >0.05 Yes Very large 3/6/0 Yes Yes RR 0.73 (0.51, 1.06)
 Prostate cancer Obs High vs. low Any tea >0.05 Yes Large 6/15/2 Yes Yes RR 0.86 (0.71, 1.04)
 Prostate cancer Obs Any vs. none Any tea >0.05 Yes Large 7/20/2 Yes Yes RR 0.87 (0.75, 1.01)
 Prostate cancer Obs High vs. low Black tea >0.05 Yes Not large 1/9/1 No Yes RR 0.99 (0.82, 1.20)
 Rectal cancer Obs High vs. low Green tea >0.05 Yes Large 3/6/0 No Yes RR 0.97 (0.77, 1.22)
 Renal cell carcinoma Obs Any vs. none Any tea >0.05 Yes Very large 1/11/0 No Yes RR 1.03 (0.88, 1.21)
 Skin cancer (non-melanoma) Obs Any vs. none Any tea >0.05 Yes Not large 4/4/0 No Yes OR 0.88 (0.76, 1.02)
1

CC, case-control studies; Co, cohort studies; Obs, observational studies; PI, prediction interval.

2

Heterogeneity is defined as “Very large” when I2 > 75%, “Large” when 50% < I2 < 75%, and “Not large” when I2 < 50%.

3

Number of individual studies of effect size with statistical significance in direction of decreased cancer risk(D)/no association(N)/increased cancer risk(I).

4

The presence of small study effects is determined if the Egger P value is <0.10.

5

Summary effect with 95% CI value obtained from umbrella review combining meta-analyses of the same comparison.

6

Although heterogeneity is large, the distribution of the effect sizes was considered over the I2 metrics.

7

The value is rounded up (to 2 decimal places), and hence is statistically significant.