Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 27;11(6):1569–1582. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa082

TABLE 2.

Summary of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating association between total vegetable and fruit consumption and genital and urinary cancer prognosis1

Cancer site Outcome n (cases) Follow-up (years) Gender age (years) Dietary assessment Exposure categorization HR/RR (95% CI) timeframe(2,3) Adjustments Author, year (ref.) (country)
Ovarian ACM811 (547) 5.9 ± 3.8 (mean ± SD) Female18–79 FFQ V: T3 (≥5) vs. T1 (<3) s/d. F: T3 (≥4) vs. T1 (none or <2) s/d 2 RR : 0.88 (0.68, 1.13)2RR : 0.82 (0.63, 1.07) Age at diagnosis, FIGO stage, amount of residual disease, grade, tumor subtype, smoking status, BMI, physical activity index, marital status, and daily caloric intake Playdon et al., 2017 (59) (Australia)
Ovarian ACM636 (354)CCSM636 (305) 17 (max) Female50–79 HEI V: T3 (5) vs. T1 (2.5) points4F: T3 (5) vs. T1 (2.5) points5V: T3 (5) vs. T1 (2.5) points4F: T3 (5) vs. T1 (2.5) points5 2 HR: 0.70 (0.47, 1.04)2HR: 0.82 (0.55, 1.21)2HR: 0.76 (0.48, 1.20)2HR: 0.84 (0.54, 1.28) Age at diagnosis, stage at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, diabetes, physical activity, total energy intake, waist circumference, family history of ovarian cancer, and clinical trial arms Thomson et al., 2014 (60) (US)
Ovarian ACM341 (176) 10 (max) Female18–74 FFQ V: T3 (≥2) vs. T1 (<1) s/d F: T3 (≥2) vs. T1 (<1) s/d. V+F: T3 (≥5) vs. T1 (<3) s/d 2 HR: 0.66 (0.43, 1.01)2HR: 0.67 (0.44,1 .04)2HR: 0.61 (0.38, 0.98) Age group, race, stage, grade, residual lesions, smoking status, BMI, oral contraceptive use, parity, and total energy intake Dolecek et al., 2010 (61) (US)
Ovarian ACM609 (394) 7.3 (5, 8.3)mean (min, max) Female18–79 FFQ V: T3 (>5.6) vs. T1 (<3.9) s/d F: T3 (>4.5) vs. T1 (<2.8) s/d. 2 HR: 0.75 (0.57, 0.99)2HR: 0.89 (0.67, 1.18) FIGO stage, age, grade, total energy intake and BMI Nagle et al., 2003 (62) (Australia)
Prostate ACM777 (263)CCSM777 (81) 7.5 (median)5.7 (median) Male66 (median) FFQ V: Q4 (≥203) vs. Q1 (<102) g/d F: Q4 (≥380) vs. Q1 (<152) g/d V (cut-off: 146) + F (cut-off: 247) V: Q4 (≥203) vs. Q1 (<102) g/d F: Q4 (≥380) vs. Q1 (<152) g/d V (cut-off: 146) + F (cut-off: 247) 2 HR: 0.81 (0.56, 1.16)2HR: 0.63 (0.44, 0.90)2HR: 0.66 (0.47, 0.93)2HR: 0.82 (0.42, 1.58)2HR: 0.78 (0.38, 1.61)2HR: 0.89 (0.48, 1.63) Area of residence at diagnosis, calendar period, age at diagnosis, years of education, Gleason score, BMI, smoking habits and total energy intake Taborelli et al., 2017 (50) (Italy)
Bladder First R:728 (241)2389 (144)3Multiple R:728 (391)2389 (221)3 3.7 ± 1.5 (mean ± SD) M/F69 (mean) FFQ V: T3 (>2.5) vs. T1 (<1.5) p/d F: T3 (>1.5) vs. T1 (<1) p/d V+F : T3 (>4) vs. T1 (<2.5) p/dV: T3 (>2.5) vs. T1 (<1.5) p/dF: T3 (>1.5) vs. T1 (<1) p/dV+F: T3 (>4) vs. T1 (<2.5) p/d 2 HR: 1.02 (0.74, 1.41)3HR: 0.77 (0.50, 1.18)2HR: 0.85 (0.63, 1.14)3HR: 1.07 (0.78, 1.47)2HR:1.07 (0.78, 1.47)3HR: 0.65 (0.42, 1.01)2HR: 0.97 (0.86, 1.11)3HR: 0.96 (0.74, 1.09)2HR: 1.05 (0.91, 1.20)3HR: 1.02 (0.87, 1.20)2HR: 1.02 (0.90, 1.15)3HR: 1.00 (0.85, 1.18) Age, sex, smoking status, tumor stage, grade, size, and multiplicity [and additionally adjusted for re-resection of a bladder tumor (second transurethral resection) in the time to multiple recurrences analysis] Jochems et al., 2018 (51) (UK)
Bladder ACM239 (179)CCSM239 (101) 8 (mean)6.4 (<1,25.1)median (min, max) M/Fcategories: <60, 60–70 and >70 FFQ V: T3 (>85.5) vs. T1 (<52) s/moF: T3 (>51) vs. T1 (<27.5) s/moV: T3 (>85.5) vs. T1 (<52) s/moF: T3 (>51) vs. T1 (<27.5) s/mo 2 HR: 0.91 (0.62, 1.36)2HR: 0.91 (0.62, 1.33)2HR: 1.06 (0.63, 1.78)2HR: 1.09 (0.66, 1.81) Age at diagnosis, total meat intake, pack-years of smoking, tumor stage and radiation therapy Tang et al., 2010 (38) (US)
1

Pre- and postdiagnosis dietary vegetables and fruit were not mixed in the meta-analysis. ACM, all-cause mortality; CCSM, cancer cause-specific mortality; F, fruit; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; HEI, healthy eating index; M/F, males and females; p/d, portion/day; R, cancer recurrence; ref., reference; RR, risk ratio; s/d, serving/day; s/mo, serving/month; V, vegetables; V+F, vegetables and fruit.

2

Prediagnosis.

3

Postdiagnosis.

4

1.1 compared with 0.6 cup eq/1000 kcal.

5

0.8 compared with 0.4 cup eq/1000 kcal.