Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct;10(5):1175–1183. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-645

Table 2. Relationship between platelet count and dabigatran-related bleeding in different models.

   N Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
PLT (×109) 576 [50] 1.00 (1.00, 1.01) 0.768 0.95 (0.91, 1.00) 0.557 1.00 (0.99, 1.00) 0.357
PLT count, ×109/L
   <100 25 [4] Reference Reference Reference
   100–200 323 [24] 0.44 (0.15, 1.27) 0.131 0.34 (0.11, 1.01) 0.053 0.24 (0.08, 0.75) 0.014
   ≥200 228 [22] 0.59 (0.20, 1.70) 0.328 0.38 (0.13, 1.16) 0.106 0.26 (0.08, 0.86) 0.028
P for trend 0.892 0.650 0.395
Dichotomous
   <100 25 [4] 1.99 (0.72, 5.54) 0.185 2.81 (0.98, 8.01) 0.054 4.05 (1.32, 12.46) 0.014
   ≥100 551 [46] Reference Reference Reference

Model 1: crude model. Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, smoking, drinking, BMI, type of AF. Model 3: as model 2, and additionally adjusted for eGFR, hypertension, CHD, HF, previous stroke or TIA, PAD, history of bleeding, ACEIs/ARBs, beta-blockers, PPIs, amiodarone, digoxin, antiplatelet agents and statins.