Table 2. Clinical studies with VH-IVUS imaging—evaluation of drug efficacy.
Authors | Subjects | Therapy | Outcomes | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nasu et al. (17) |
80 subjects with stable CAD | Fluvastatin vs.
no statin use |
Percent change in atheroma volume | Patients treated with fluvastatin were more likely to exhibit an increase in fibrous tissue volume (P=0.03) and a decrease of fibro-fatty (P<0.0001) and necrotic core volumes (P=0.004). Change in dense calcium volume was smaller in fluvastatin group (P=0.03) |
Puri et al. (18) |
71 subjects with CAD | 80 mg atorvastatin vs. 20 mg rosuvastatin | Change in VH-IVUS derived plaque composition | High-intensity statin use was associated with a reduction in fibro-fatty tissue volume (P<0.001) and an increase in dense calcium tissue volume (P=0.002) |
Räber et al. (19) |
82 STEMI patients | 10 mg rosuvastatin | Change in percent atheroma volume and VH-IVUS derived plaque composition | During the 13-month follow-up period, 10mg rosuvastatin induced a significant reduction of percent atheroma volume [−0.9% (95% CI: −1.56% to −0.25%, P=0.007)]. In addition, an increased percent volume of dense calcium [+1.28% (95% CI: 0.66% to 1.9%), P<0.001] and a decrease in percent volume of fibrous tissue [−1.38% (95% CI: −2.28 to −0.47), P=0.003] were observed. This therapy did not significantly modify volume of necrotic core [−0.05% (95% CI: −1.05 to 0.96), P=0.926] |
ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CAD, coronary artery disease; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; VH-IVUS, virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound.