TABLE 3.
Combinations of samples subjected to comparative RepeatExplorer analysis.
| Sample IDs and numbers of reads | Total no. of reads | Coveragea |
| a) Comparison of the representatives of parental species | ||
| IntXb (1,622,720) + PreXc (1,544,840) | 3,167,560 | 0.066 |
| b) Comparison of natural apomictic hybrids (3x) and representatives of parental species | ||
| PalA (2,438,920) + IntXb (1,622,720) + PreXc (1,544,840) | 5,606,480 | 0.066 |
| PalF (2,492,160) + IntXb (1,622,720) + PreXc (1,544,840) | 5,659,720 | 0.066 |
| PicF (2,455,200) + IntXb (1,622,720) + PreXc (1,544,840) | 5,622,760 | 0.066 |
| PicB (2,293,280) + IntXb (1,622,720) + PreXc (1,544,840) | 5,460,840 | 0.066 |
| c) Comparison of synthetic hybrids (2x) and their actual parents | ||
| Hyb2 (1,920,000) + IntA (1,968,000) + PreC (1,872,000) | 5,760,000 | 0.080 |
| Hyb3 (1,920,000) + IntA (1,968,000) + PreC (1,872,000) | 5,760,000 | 0.080 |
| Hyb4 (1,914,668) + IntA (1,968,000) + PreC (1,872,000) | 5,754,668 | 0.080 |
aCoverage calculated using 1C-values.bIntX: sample created by pooling reads from both H. intybaceum individuals.cPreX: sample created by pooling reads from both H. prenanthoides individuals.