Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct;9(5):1363–1369. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-336

Table 2. Comparison of EMG signal changes during thermal injury induced by Hemostatix Shaw scalpel and by the electrosurgical pencil (Animal 3) and Harmonic ACE+ (Animal 4).

Animal Device Distance (mm) Duration (sec) Amplitude (μV) AE LOS
Baseline Lowest, n [%]
No. 3
   Side: L Electrosurgical pencil Coag 25 5 5 1,104 1,104 [100]
3 5 1,104 1,104 [100]
1 5 1,104 205 [19] + +
   Side: R Hemostatix 300 °C 5 5 930 836 [90]
3 5 930 821 [88]
1 5 930 720 [77]
<0.1 (contact) 1 930 273 [29] + +
No. 4
   Side: L Harmonic ACE+ Max 5 5 5 1,222 1,147 [94]
3 5 1,222 1,140 [93]
1 5 1,222 944 [77]
<0.1 (contact) 3 1,222 148 [12] +
   Side: R Hemostatix 210 °C 5 5 1,212 1,212 [100]
3 5 1,212 1,212 [100]
1 5 1,212 809 [67] +
<0.1 (contact) 2 1,212 210 [17] + +

AE, adverse EMG event; EMG, electromyography.