Table 2.

Af colonization and ABPA diagnosis in different types of residential area for all included CF patients.

All included CF patients, n = 1016
	Large city, n = 314	Urban district, n = 461	Rural district, n = 141	Sparsely populated rural area, n = 100	P value
Af colonization, n (%)	115 (36.6 %)	138 (29.9 %)	34 (24.1 %)	20 (20.0%)	0.004
ABPA, n (%)	64 (20.4%)	67 (14.5%)	16 (11.3%)	18 (18%)	0.054
CF patients >= 18 years, n = 395
	Large city n = 91	Urban district n = 186	Rural district n = 68	Sparsely populated rural area n = 50	P value
Af colonization, n (%)	22 (24.2 %)	33 (17.7%)	8 (11.8 %)	10 (20.0%)	0.247
ABPA, n (%)	11 (12.1%)	6 (3.2%)	7 (10.3%)	6 (12.0%)	0.021
CF patients ≥ 18 years, n = 621
	Large city n = 223	Urban district n = 275	Rural district n = 73	Sparsely populated rural area n = 50	P value
Af colonization, n (%)	93 (41.7 %)	105 (38.2 %)	26 (35.6 %)	10 (20.0%)	0.039
ABPA, n (%)	53 (23.8%)	61 (22.2%)	9 (12.3%)	12 (24.0%)	0.210