Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 18;10(11):e01760. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1760

TABLE 1.

Baseline characteristics of the two samples

Intervention group (n = 62) Control group (n = 44) F2 p
Characteristic variable
25(OH)D, nmol/L 39.1 ± 10.5 42.1 ± 12.6 1.804 0.182
Age, age 46.3 ± 9.7 43.3 ± 13.7 1.735 0.191
BMI, kg/cm2 24.1 ± 4.2 23.6 ± 4.1 0.383 0.537
Blood collection in winter and spring 29(46.8) 22(50.0) 0.107 0.743
Unmarried/divorced 5(8.1) 12(27.3) 7.052 0.27
Male 18(29.0) 10(22.7) 0.526 0.468
City of residence 24(38.7) 20(45.5) 0.487 0.784
Junior high school and below 45(72.6) 27(61.4) 2.017 0.365
Monthly household income <4,000 38(61.3) 28(63.6) 1.818 0.403
Daytime outdoor time: 2 hr < 2 hr 28(53.8) 18(64.3) 0.812 0.368
Drinking 3(5.8) 3(10.7) 0.642 0.423
Smoking 6(11.5) 5(17.9) 0.613 0.434
No physical activity 20(38.5) 8(28.6) 0.783 0.376
Sitting time <2 hr 18(34.6) 8(28.6) 0.303 0.582
No antipsychotic use 5(8.1) 6(13.6) 0.859 0.354
Scale score
HAMA 18.0 ± 5.7 17.9 ± 7.5 0.001 0.974
HAMD 30.0 ± 7.6 29.2 ± 11.6 0.167 0.684
RPAS 27.2 ± 12.3 27.4 ± 11.7 0.005 0.943
RSAS 16.7 ± 6.0 15.5 ± 6.2 0.692 0.408

Data were displayed with mean ± standard deviation or numbers (%). At baseline, there were no significant differences in general demographic characteristics and scale scores between the intervention group and the control group.

Continuous variables were analyzed by one‐way ANOVA, and categorical variables were analyzed by chi‐square test.

Abbreviations: HAMA‐14, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale‐14; HAMD‐17, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale‐17; RPAS, Revised Physical Anhedonia scale; RSAS, Revised Social Anhedonia Scale.