Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 31;10(11):e01822. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1822

Table 3.

Performance of the predictive models

Training Validation
Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy AUC 95% CI of AUC Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy AUC 95% CI of AUC
Lower Upper Lower Upper
Initial DBN a 0.786 0.754 0.756 0.836 0.794 0.879 0.842 0.594 0.619 0.772 0.653 0.891
Logistic b 0.907 0.798 0.807 0.915 0.884 0.946 0.880 0.831 0.835 0.914 0.879 0.944
DBN‐logistic c 1.000 0.994 0.995 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.947 0.123 0.212 0.559 0.486 0.633
DBN including d
Age+Orange 0.786 0.754 0.756 0.845 0.803 0.886 0.737 0.712 0.714 0.730 0.606 0.854
Age+Leather 0.875 0.708 0.720 0.853 0.815 0.890 0.737 0.700 0.704 0.751 0.623 0.880
Age+Cinnamon 0.839 0.726 0.735 0.856 0.818 0.893 0.895 0.600 0.630 0.779 0.672 0.886
Age+Peppermint 0.821 0.738 0.744 0.864 0.825 0.903 0.737 0.676 0.683 0.736 0.608 0.863
Age+Banana 0.893 0.674 0.690 0.852 0.812 0.892 0.737 0.759 0.757 0.771 0.650 0.893
Age+Lemon 0.839 0.711 0.720 0.846 0.807 0.885 0.737 0.688 0.693 0.753 0.636 0.870
Age+Liquorice 0.839 0.717 0.726 0.851 0.813 0.889 0.684 0.735 0.730 0.766 0.649 0.883
Age+Coffee 0.839 0.738 0.745 0.850 0.809 0.891 0.842 0.594 0.619 0.766 0.645 0.887
Age+Cloves 0.839 0.707 0.716 0.843 0.802 0.884 0.842 0.635 0.656 0.773 0.655 0.891
Age+Pineapple 0.786 0.754 0.756 0.844 0.803 0.885 0.737 0.729 0.730 0.750 0.637 0.864
Age+Rose 0.893 0.677 0.693 0.854 0.815 0.893 0.737 0.718 0.720 0.767 0.643 0.890
Age+Fish 0.857 0.704 0.715 0.853 0.816 0.891 0.789 0.671 0.683 0.772 0.660 0.885
Age+MMSE+Orange 1.000 0.808 0.822 0.947 0.929 0.964 0.722 0.888 0.872 0.826 0.715 0.937
Age+MMSE+Leather 1.000 0.839 0.851 0.953 0.937 0.968 0.684 0.873 0.854 0.783 0.664 0.902
Age+MMSE+Cinnamon 1.000 0.833 0.846 0.952 0.936 0.968 0.778 0.877 0.867 0.838 0.731 0.946
Age+MMSE+Peppermint 1.000 0.805 0.819 0.951 0.934 0.968 0.722 0.865 0.851 0.817 0.703 0.932
Age+MMSE+Banana 1.000 0.853 0.864 0.958 0.944 0.972 0.632 0.862 0.839 0.743 0.623 0.863
Age+MMSE+Lemon 1.000 0.840 0.852 0.951 0.935 0.967 0.684 0.837 0.822 0.767 0.652 0.881
Age+MMSE+Liquorice 1.000 0.843 0.855 0.951 0.935 0.967 0.684 0.844 0.828 0.774 0.657 0.890
Age+MMSE+Coffee 1.000 0.789 0.805 0.949 0.931 0.967 0.789 0.756 0.760 0.793 0.683 0.903
Age+MMSE+Cloves 1.000 0.833 0.846 0.956 0.940 0.971 0.737 0.830 0.821 0.792 0.679 0.905
Age+MMSE+Pineapple 1.000 0.832 0.844 0.950 0.934 0.967 0.789 0.825 0.822 0.836 0.730 0.942
Age+MMSE+Rose 1.000 0.848 0.859 0.952 0.937 0.968 0.667 0.845 0.827 0.775 0.649 0.901
Age+MMSE+Fish 1.000 0.849 0.860 0.959 0.945 0.973 0.632 0.904 0.876 0.777 0.655 0.899
a

Incident dementia was only dependent on age.

b

Multivariable logistic regression model using the variables based on the bidirectional stepwise selection.

c

Incident dementia was dependent on the variables used in the multivariable logistic regression.

d

Discrete Bayesian networks (DBN) including dependency of incident dementia on the variables below.