Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 18;2(2):fcaa147. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa147

Table 2.

Interventional TMS studies to improve LID in patients with Parkinson’s disease

First author, year
Sample size
Brain target
TMS protocol Main findings Clinical dyskinesia score Score before TMS Score after sham TMS Score after real TMS Pairwise testing (P-value) ANOVA (P-value)

Koch et al., 2005

 

8 patients

 

Target: SMA

Single rTMS session at 1 or 5 Hz for 15 min with continuous apomorphine infusion 1-Hz rTMS session reduced AIMS for 15 min after rTMS; 5-Hz rTMS session had no effect AIMS

6.75 ± 2.0

 

6.00 ± 1.8

6.35 ± 1.9

 

6.35 ± 1.9

2.25 ± 1.8

 

7.38 ± 2.7

P < 0.01a

P < 0.00b

 

P < 0.12b

Brusa et al., 2006

 

10 patients

 

Target: SMA

Single and multiple 1-Hz rTMS sessions for 15 min after levodopa intake Single 1-Hz rTMS session reduced AIMS for 15 min after rTMS; Multiple 1-Hz rTMS sessions (1/day, 5 days) had same effect AIMS

0.0 ± 0.0c

 

0.0 ± 0.0c

6.62 ± 1.0

 

6.62 ± 1.0

1.37 ± 1.5

 

1.45 ± 1.4

P < 0.001b

 

P < 0.001b

Lohse et al., 2020 (data reported in this publication)

 

17 patients

 

Target: PreSMA

Single 1-Hz rTMS session for 30 min before levodopa intake Single-session 1 Hz reduced and delayed UDysRS

UDysRS

 

Time to LID onset

12d

 

24.5 min

9

 

36.5 min

P = 0.032e

 

P = 0.019e

Flamez et al., 2016

 

9 patients (single)

 

6 patients (multiple)

 

Target: M1

Single bilateral 1-Hz rTMS session for 16 min after levodopa intake; Multiple bilateral 1-Hz rTMS sessions for 32 min during continued levodopa treatment Single 1-Hz rTMS session did not produce an anti-dyskinetic effect Multiple sessions (2/day, 5 days) did not produce an anti-dyskinetic effect

AIMS

 

AIMS

 

UPDRSIV

 

PDYS-26

0 ± 0

 

12 ± 5

 

4.8 ± 0.8

 

22 ± 11

8 ± 5

 

11 ± 5

 

4.7 ± 0.5

 

22 ± 12 (Day 5)

10 ± 5

 

8 ± 5

 

4.8 ± 0.8

 

22 ± 11 (Day 5)

P = 0.11f

 

P = 0.23f

 

P = 0.84f

 

P = 0.40f

Wagle-Shukla et al., 2007

 

6 patients

 

Target: M1

Multiple 1-Hz rTMS sessions for 15 min after levodopa intake Multiple sessions (1/day, 10 days in 2 weeks) reduced CAPSIT for 1 day after the last stimulation CAPSIT-PD 5.6 ± 2.8 No sham 3.5 ± 1.6 (1 day after last rTMS) P = 0.03g P < 0.06h

Filipović et al., 2009

 

10 patients

 

Target: M1

Multiple 1-Hz rTMS sessions for 32 min during continued levodopa treatment Multiple sessions (1/day, 4 days) did not reduce CDRS on direct comparison CDRS 22.1 ± 8.2 20.8 ± 6.7 20.4 ± 7.9 P = 0.22i P < 0.043j

Sayın et al., 2014

 

17 patients

 

Target: SMA

Multiple 1-Hz rTMS sessions for 30 min during continued levodopa treatmentk Multiple sessions (1/day, 10 days) reduced AIMS for 24 h after stimulation AIMS 16.61 ± 6.23 9.56 ± 4.06l 13.72 ± 7.28 P = 0.024m

Koch et al., 2009

 

10 patients (single)

 

20 patients (multiple)

 

Target: Cerebellum

Single cTBS sessions after levodopa intake; Multiple cTBS sessions after levodopa intakek Single cTBS session reduced CAPSIT-PD; Multiple cTBS sessions (1/day, 10 days, in 2 weeks) reduced CAPSIT for up to 4 weeks after stimulations CAPSIT-PD

∼ 6.5n

∼5.8n

 

∼5.8n (3 days after last rTMS)

∼3.8n

 

∼3.8n (3 days after last rTMS)

P = 0.011o

 

P = 0.008p

P < 0.007o

 

P < 0.0001p

Cerasa et al., 2015

 

11 patients

 

Targets: right IFC and M1

Single cTBS session after levodopa intake Single cTBS session of right IFG reduced AIMS for 30 min after stimulation; No effect of single cTBS session over M1 AIMS

6.33 ± 1.4

 

∼5.0q

4.50 ± 1.3

 

∼5.0q

P = 0.04r

Ponzo et al., 2016

 

10 patients

 

Target: right IFC

Single cTBS session after levodopa intake Single-session cTBS reduced AIMS relative to sham cTBS AIMS ∼3.0c,s ∼7.0s ∼4.0s P = 0.02t

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Studies are sorted by TMS protocol and thereafter by year. AIMS = Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale; CAPSIT-PD = The Core Assessment Program for Surgical Interventional Therapies in Parkinson’s Disease; cTBS = continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation; IFC = inferior frontal cortex; M1 = primary motor cortex; PDYS-26 = 26-item Parkinson Disease Dyskinesia Scale; preSMA = pre-supplementary motor area; rTMS = repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; SMA = supplementary motor area; UDysRS = Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale; UPDRS = Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale.

a

Wilcoxon test of ‘score after real TMS’ versus ‘pre-TMS score’.

b

Friedman ANOVA for repeated measures with time as the main effect for the entire 1-Hz TMS condition with multiple time points, not only the score reported in this table.

c

The pre-score was measured immediately after levodopa intake in patients withdrawn from therapy since the night before.

d

These are median UDysRS scores.

e

One-tailed Wilcoxon test for ‘score after real TMS’ versus ‘score after sham TMS’.

f

Two-way repeated measure ANOVA of interaction between stimulation (sham or real) as between-subject factor and time as within-subjects factor.

g

Paired t-test. Scores are measured at peak-of-dose dyskinesia.

h

Repeated measures ANOVA.

i

One-tailed directional Wilcoxon-matched pairs test for ‘score after real TMS’ versus ‘score after sham TMS’ change from ‘pre-TMS score’.

j

Friedman ANOVA for ‘pre-TMS score’ versus ‘score after real TMS’ versus ‘score after sham TMS’.

k

This study used a parallel group design for the multi-session part of the study. All others used a one group cross-over design.

l

The ‘pre-TMS score’ for the sham group was 8.31 ± 3.52.

m

Wilcoxon test for ‘score pre-rTMS’ versus ‘score after real-rTMS’ both at 90 min after levodopa.

n

Scores were estimated taken from Fig. 4.

o

Respectively a Wilcoxon test and Friedman ANOVA for ‘score after real TMS’ versus ‘score after sham TMS’ both at 30 min after levodopa.

p

Respectively a Wilcoxon test and Friedman ANOVA for the ‘score after real TMS’ versus the ‘pre-TMS score’ both at 30 min after levodopa.

q

Scores were estimated taken from Fig. 4.

r

Wilcoxon test for ‘score after real TMS’ versus ‘score after sham TMS’ both at 30 min after levodopa.

s

Scores were estimated taken from Fig. 1D.

t

Wilcoxon t-test for ‘score after real TMS’ versus ‘score after sham TMS’.