Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;25(45):2001735. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.45.2001735

Table 1. Comparison of epidemiological stages of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in European countries, 2013–2019 (n = 37).

Country Epidemiological stage of spread of CRAb Change between 2014–15 and 2019
2013 [2] 2014–15
(previously unpublished)
2019
Albania Stage 1 Stage 1 Stage 1
Austria Stage 1 Stage 1 Stage 2b
Belgium Stage 3 Stage 2b Stage 2b
Bosnia and Herzegovinaa Stage 1 Stage 3 Stage 3
Bulgaria Stage 2b Stage 2a Stage 2b
Croatia Stage 5 Stage 5 Stage 5
Cyprus Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 2a
Czechia Stage 4 Stage 2b Stage 2b
Denmark Stage 2b Stage 1 Stage 1
Estonia Stage 2a Uncertain Stage 2a NA
Finland Stage 1 Stage 2a Stage 1
France Stage 3 Stage 2b Stage 3
Germany Stage 4 Stage 3 Stage 2b
Greece Stage 5 Stage 5 Stage 5
Hungary Stage 4 Stage 4 Stage 4
Iceland Stage 0 Stage 1 Stage 1
Ireland Stage 2a Stage 1 Stage 1
Italy Stage 5 Stage 5 Stage 5
Kosovob Stage 3 Stage 5 Stage 2b
Latvia Stage 5 Stage 2b Stage 4
Lithuania Stage 5 Uncertain Stage 5 NA
Luxembourg Stage 1 Stage 0 Stage 1
Malta Stage 1 Stage 2a Stage 1
Montenegro Stage 0 Uncertain Uncertainc NA
Netherlands Stage 1 Stage 2a Stage 1
North Macedonia Stage 1 Stage 1 Stage 2b
Norway Stage 1 Stage 2a Stage 1
Poland Stage 2b Stage 4 Stage 3
Portugal Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 5
Romania Stage 2b Stage 5 Stage 5
Serbia Stage 2b Stage 5 Stage 4
Slovakia Stage 4 Stage 4 Stage 4
Slovenia Stage 2a Stage 4 Stage 3
Spain Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 3
Sweden Stage 2a Stage 2a Stage 1
Turkey Stage 2b Stage 5 Stage 5
United Kingdomd Stage 4 Stage 4 Stage 2b

CRAb: carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. NA: not applicable.

The epidemiological stages of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii are defined as follow: stage 0: no cases reported; stage 1: sporadic occurrence (epidemiologically-unrelated single cases); stage 2a: single hospital outbreak (two or more epidemiologically-associated cases with indistinguishable geno- or phenotype in a single institution); stage 2b: sporadic hospital outbreaks (unrelated hospital outbreaks with epidemiologically unrelated introduction or different strains, no autochthonous inter-institutional transmission reported); stage 3: regional spread (more than one epidemiologically-related hospital outbreak confined to hospitals that are part of the same region or health district, indicating regional autochthonous inter-institutional transmission); stage 4: inter-regional spread (multiple epidemiologically-related outbreaks occurring in different health districts, indicating inter-regional autochthonous inter-institutional transmission); stage 5: endemic situation (most hospitals in a country are repeatedly seeing cases admitted from autochthonous sources).

a The results reported for Bosnia and Herzegovina only apply to the Republic of Srpska.

b This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with United Nations Security Council resolution 1244/99 and the International Court of Justice Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.

c Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas spp. are becoming a major problem in Montenegro as they are frequently isolated and are increasingly resistant to carbapenems. However, a National Reference Laboratory for these bacteria does not exist and all answers in the manuscript are connected with that fact. Therefore, it was judged that a realistic picture of the situation cannot be presented.

d The reported results are for the United Kingdom overall. The epidemiological stages vary among countries within the United Kingdom.