Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 11;34(1):e00115-20. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00115-20

TABLE 12.

Randomized trials assessing meropenem-vaborbactam

Trial ID (reference) Comparatora Phase Designb No. of patients randomized Indicationc Exclusion of immunocompromised patients Outcomesd
No. (%) Risk difference (95% CIs)
Wunderink 2018 (193) BAT 3 Noninferential 77 CRE infections: cUTI, cIAI, BSI, or NP Immunocompromised allowed Mortality: 1/32 (3.1) vs 5/15 (33.3) −29.0 (−54.3 to −3.7)
Clinical cure TOC: 19/32 (59.4) vs 4/15 (26.7) 32.7 (4.6 to 60.8)
Microbiol cure TOC: 17/32 (53.1) vs 5/15 (33.3) 19.8 (−9.7 to 49.3)
Kaye 2018 (189) PIP-TAZ 3 NI 550 cUTI Organ transplant; HIV (CD4 <200/mm3); chemotherapy; immunosuppressive therapy; neutropenia <1,000/mm3 Mortality: 2/272 (0.7) vs 2/273 (0.7)
Clinical cure TOC: 174/192 (90.6) vs 157/182 (86.3) 4.4 (−2.2 to 11.1)
Microbiol response TOC: 132/192 (68.8) vs 113/182 (62.1) 6.7 (−3.0 to 16.2)
a

BAT, best available therapy, including monotherapy or any combination of carbapenem, aminoglycoside, polymyxin B, colistin, tigecycline, or ceftazidime-avibactam; PIP-TAZ, piperacillin-tazobactam.

b

NI, noninferiority.

c

CRE, carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales; cUTI, complicated urinary tract infection; cIAI, complicated intra-abdominal infection; NP, nosocomial pneumonia; BSI, bloodstream infection.

d

TOC, test of cure; microbiol, microbiological.