Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 30;10(26):12241–12262. doi: 10.7150/thno.52729

Table 4.

Comparison of photothermal composite nanomaterials for antibacterial activities

Material Irradiation (λ) Target microbe Ref.
Ag+-GCS-PDA@AuNRs 808 nm E. coli and MRSA 113
Dap-GCS-PDA@AuNRs 808 nm MRSA 114
AuNC@Dap/PDA-aSpa 808 nm S. aureus 115
PDA@Au-Hap NPs 808 nm E. coli and S. aureus 116
PATA-C4@CuS 980 nm S. aureus, B. amyloliquefaciens, P. aeruginosa and E. coli 117
Au@Rubpy/GO 785 nm E. coli and S. aureus 110
GO-IONP-Ag 808 nm S. aureus 118
Au-QCMC-GO/nanocellulose paper 808 nm E. coli, P. aeruginosa and B. subtilis 112
GO-Tob@CuS 980 nm E. coli and P. aeruginosa 119
Fe3O4@GO-QCS 808 nm E. coli and S. aureus 120
rGO/AuNS 808 nm E. coli and S. aureus 111
rGO/MSN/Ag 808 nm E. coli, P. putida and Rhodococcus 121
Ag@rGO-Fe3O4-PEI 785 nm E. coli 122
rGO-Fe3O4-Au-Ag-Au 785 nm E. coli 123
Ag/ZnO/rGO 808 nm E. coli 124
Fe3O4-CNT-PNIPAM 808 nm E. coli and S. aureus 125
BP/Au 808 nm E. faecalis 129