Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 16;20:1710. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09788-x

Table 2.

Measures of cluster partitions quality for different numbera of clusters

PBCb HGc HGSDd ASWe ASWwf CHg R2h CHsqi R2sqj HCk
2 clusters 0.74 0.99 0.99 0.75 0.75 2063.58 0.25 4404.48 0.41 0.01
3 clusters 0.66 0.84 0.84 0.68 0.68 4232.97 0.57 5975.31 0.65 0.07
4 clusters 0.67 0.84 0.84 0.70 0.70 3589.46 0.63 6458.03 0.75 0.07
5 clusters 0.71 0.92 0.92 0.72 0.72 3419.08 0.68 6821.89 0.81 0.03
6 clusters 0.73 0.97 0.97 0.76 0.76 3502.94 0.73 6901.61 0.84 0.02
7 clusters 0.73 0.98 0.98 0.77 0.77 3247.65 0.75 7341.25 0.87 0.01
8 clusters 0.73 0.98 0.98 0.77 0.77 3039.62 0.77 7073.04 0.89 0.01
9 clusters 0.73 0.98 0.98 0.77 0.77 2786.74 0.78 6716.10 0.89 0.01
10 clusters 0.73 0.99 0.99 0.78 0.78 2587.42 0.79 6513.68 0.90 0.01
11 clusters 0.73 0.99 0.99 0.78 0.78 2410.38 0.79 6289.63 0.91 0.01
12 clusters 0.73 0.99 0.99 0.76 0.76 2324.17 0.80 6086.74 0.91 0.01
13 clusters 0.73 0.99 0.99 0.77 0.77 2270.38 0.81 5883.08 0.92 0.00

aThe here selected number of clusters market in bold

bPoint Biserial Correlation

cHubert’s Gamma

dHubert’s Somers’ D

eAverage Silhouette Width

fAverage Silhouette Width (weighted)

gCalinski-Harabasz index

hPseudo R2

iCalinski-Harabasz index squared

jPseudo R2 squared

kHubert’s C