Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 1;39(22):e104941. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020104941

Figure EV2. (Related to Fig 3) Sub‐cellular localization of PAP8 variants.

Figure EV2

  • A
    Transient assay in onion epidermal cells, pictures are given at the same scale. FL, full‐length ORF; −G, translational fusion with GFP; ΔNLS, deletion of the NLS; ΔcTP, deletion of the cTP, ΔΔ, deletion of both the NLS and the cTP. Onion cell co‐transfected with the corresponding variant fused to GFP and a plastid control fused to RFP (PAP10, PAP10‐RFP or RecA, RecA‐RFP) Merge, merged channels; DIC, differential interference contrast microscopy pictures to reveal the position of the nucleus within the cell when fluorescent nuclei were observed (marked with white arrowheads).
  • B, C
    Confocal imaging of stably expressed CaMV35S::PAP8∆cTP‐GFP (B) or pPAP8::PAP8∆nls‐GFP (C) in cotyledons of Arabidopsis thaliana; white arrowheads indicate nuclei; green arrowheads indicate sub‐plastidial localization. Observations similar to (C) were recorded for pPAP8::PAP8FL‐GFP.
  • D
    Confocal imaging of stably expressed CaMV35S::PAP10‐GFP in cotyledons of Arabidopsis thaliana showing the PEP‐PAP complex; the green arrowhead indicates the putative location of PEP‐PAP complexes within one chloroplast.
  • E–H
    PAP8‐GFP in stromules of onion epidermal cells expressed alone (E) or in co‐localization with PAP10‐GFP (F–H); stromules (str, white arrowheads) are only marked by PAP8‐GFP.

Source data are available online for this figure.