Table 2.
Summary Data on TB Reactivation with the Use of Anti-TNF Therapies in IBD and Other Rheumatological Conditions
Publication | Brief description of methodology | Country | Key findings |
---|---|---|---|
Meta-analyses | |||
Bonovas et al. (2016)20 | Meta-analysis of 49 RCTs, focused on risk of infections with biologics | NA | Odds of TB numerically higher with biologics vs placebo (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.71–5.89). |
9 Cases (0.36%) of TB infection with biologics vs 1 (0.07%) with placebo. | |||
Ford et al. (2013)21 | Meta-analysis of 22 RCTs, focused on risk of opportunistic infections with anti-TNF in IBD | NA | Risk of TB numerically higher with anti-TNF vs placebo (RR, 2.52; 95% CI, 0.62–10.21). |
8 Cases (0.2%) of TB infection with anti-TNF vs zero with placebo. | |||
All except 1 case occurred in trials that screened patients for exposure prior to entry. | |||
Review | |||
Cantini et al. (2014)40 | RCTs, PMS, national registries; focused on risk of TB with anti-TNF | NA | Increased risk of TB with any of the 3 anti-TNF drugs. |
A 3–4 times higher risk with infliximab & adalimumab vs etanercept. | |||
Observational studies from Asian countries (in reverse chronological order) | |||
Tan et al. (2017)41 | Review of RA patients treated with anti-TNF agents (77%) and other drugs; 2003–2014; n=301 | Malaysia | 3.7% of the patients developed TB. |
Hong et al. (2017)42 | Insurance database analysis; 2011-2013; n=38,830 IBD patients | South Korea | Incidence of TB: 5-ASA (1.44 per 1,000 PY), corticosteroids (2.09), immunomodulators (2.85), anti-TNF (5.54). |
Incidence of TB significantly higher in those using anti-TNF vs not using anti-TNF (SIR, 6.53; 95% CI, 5.99–7.09). | |||
Puri et al. (2017)43 | Retrospective data analysis; n=79 UC patients treated with infliximab | India | Despite TB screening, 7 (8.8%) patients developed TB. |
3 Patients (42%) developed disseminated disease, 4 (57%) developed pulmonary disease. | |||
Jung et al. (2015)39 | Database analysis; 2005–2009; 8,421 patients; 10,021 PY exposure (patients prescribed anti-TNFs) | South Korea | Compared to etanercept (reference), IRR for TB: infliximab (IRR, 6.8; 95% CI, 3.74–12.37), adalimumab (IRR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.82–6.55). |
Compared to ankylosing spondylitis (reference), IRR for TB: IBD (IRR, 5.97; 95% CI, 3.34–10.66), RA (IRR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.57–1.83), and psoriatic arthritis (IRR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.14–7.30). | |||
Byun et al. (2015)44 | Retrospective cohort study; 2001–2013; n=525 IBD patients | South Korea | Incidence of TB: overall (1.84 per 1,000 PY), anti-TNF-α (4.89 per 1,000 PY), non-anti-TNF-α (0.45 per 1,000 PY). |
Crude incidence of TB significantly higher in patients receiving TNF-α blockers compared to TNF-α-blocker-naïve patients (3.1% vs 0.3%, p=0.011). | |||
LTBI diagnosed in 17 (10.6%) patients; none experienced reactivation of TB. | |||
Byun et al. (2015)45 | Retrospective cohort study; 2001–2013; n=873 IBD patients | South Korea | The adjusted SIR of TB was 41.7 (95% CI, 25.3–58.0), compared with that of the matched general population. |
19/25 Patients (76%) developed TB within 2–62 months of initiation of TNF-α inhibitor treatment despite screening negative for LTBI; 3 patients with LTBI (12%, 3/25) developed TB 3 months after completion of chemoprophylaxis. | |||
Çekiç et al. (2015)46 | Retrospective study; 2007–2014; n=76 IBD patients treated with infliximab and adalimumab | Turkey | 45 Patients (59.2%) had LTBI and received isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis. |
During the follow-up period, active TB was identified in 3 (4.7%) patients who were not receiving INH prophylaxis–of these, 2 patients had negative IGRA and TST results and 1 patient had positive IGRA and TST results and had received adequate treatment for TB. | |||
Chen et al. (2008)47 | Cohort of RA patients treated with adalimumab; n=43 | Taiwan | All patients underwent serial TSTs and QuantiFERON-TB Gold assays. |
Of the 43 RA patients who received adalimumab therapy, 4 (9.3%) developed active TB after starting adalimumab therapy. | |||
Takeuchi et al. (2008)48 | Post-marketing surveillance trial; 2003–2004; n=5,000 RA patients treated with infliximab | Japan | The rate of TB was 0.3%. |
Half the cases were extrapulmonary TB. | |||
Seong et al. (2007)49 | Single-center cohort; 2001–2005; n=193 RA patients treated with infliximab and etanercept | South Korea | In the infliximab-treated RA group, 2 cases of TB developed during 78.17 PY of follow-up (2,558 per 100,000 PY), and there was no case of TB during 73.67 PY of follow-up in the etanercept-treated RA group. |
The risk of TB was higher in RA patients treated with infliximab (RR, 30.1; 95% CI, 7.4–122.3) compared with the general Korean population. | |||
Kumar et al. (2006)50 | Review of patients with rheumatic diseases treated with infliximab; n=176 | India | Reactivation TB developed in 10.6% of spondyloarthropathy (SpA) patients treated with standard regimen of infliximab. |
Patients treated with lower doses of infliximab did not develop TB. | |||
Navarra et al. (2006)51 | Review of patients with rheumatic diseases treated with infliximab; n=64 | Philippines | Of the 64 patients reviewed, 5 (7.8%) developed active TB, at an interval of 1.5 to 15 months after initiation of treatment with infliximab. |
Four of the 5 patients had undergone TB screening. | |||
Observational studies from non-Asian countries (in reverse chronological order) | |||
Thi et al. (2018)52 | Database analysis; 2007–2015; n=596 IBD patients treated with anti-TNF | UK | 1.0% Patients developed TB. Of these, 5 patients had a negative LTBI screening, and 1 had indeterminate test. |
2 Patients developed miliary TB, 2 abdominal TB, 1 pleuro-pulmonary TB and 1 both pulmonary and pericardial TB. | |||
Ramos et al. (2018)53 | Retrospective review of IBD patients with LTBI (on TST/IGRA) who subsequently received biologics; n=35 | USA | One patient on adalimumab after 6 months of INH developed TB reactivation. |
TB reactivation rate: 0.98 cases per 100 PY. | |||
Carpio et al. (2016)54 | Multicenter study; TB in anti-TNF-treated IBD patients | Spain | 50 TB cases in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF. |
34% of TB cases were disseminated and 26% extrapulmonary. | |||
30 Patients (60%) developed TB despite compliance with recommended preventive measures. | |||
Abitbol et al. (2016)55 | Multicenter study; TB in anti-TNF-treated IBD patients | France | 44 TB cases in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF. |
Each patient had TB-negative screening before starting anti-TNF: TST (n=25), IGRA test (n=12), or both (n=7). | |||
40 Patients (91%) with at least 1 extrapulmonary involvement. | |||
Jauregui-Amezaga et al. (2013)56 | Database analysis; IBD patients treated with anti-TNF between 2000–2011; n=423 | Spain | 7 Patients (1.65%) developed TB. Of these, 6 had a negative LTBI screening. |
3 Patients developed pulmonary TB and 4 developed extrapulmonary disease. | |||
Mañosa et al. (2013)57 | Cohort of anti-TNF treated IBD patients; n=330 | Spain | 1.2% Patients developed active TB. |
TB, tuberculosis; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; RCT, randomized controlled trial; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk; PMS, post-marketing study; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; 5-ASA, 5-aminosalicylic acid; PY, person-year; SIR, standardized incidence ratio; UC, ulcerative colitis; IRR, incidence rate ratio; LTBI, latent tuberculosis infection; IGRA, interferon-gamma release assay; TST, tuberculin skin test.