Table 3.
Summary Data on TB Reactivation with the Use of Newer Biologic Therapies in Patients with IBD
Biologic | Publication | Type of study | Brief description | Country | Key findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vedolizumab | Bonovas et al. (2016)20 | Meta-analysis | Meta-analysis of 49 RCTs, focused on risk of infections with biologics | NA | Odds of TB numerically higher with biologics vs placebo (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.71–5.89). Results did not reach statistical significance. |
9 Cases (0.36%) of TB infection with biologics vs 1 (0.07%) with placebo. | |||||
Luthra et al. (2015)58 | Meta-analysis | Meta-analysis of 12 RCTs; focused on risk of infections with adhesion molecule antagonists | NA | Risk of opportunistic infection was not significantly higher either with non-gut-specific (RR, 2.34; 95% CI, 0.05–108.72) or gut specific drugs (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.16–14.83), compared to placebo. | |
Only one case of TB was identified. | |||||
Ng et al. (2018)59 | Review | Review on the risk of opportunistic infections with vedolizumab; safety data from the GEMINI 1, 2 & OLE studies and post-marketing data | NA | Clinical trials: 6 TB events in 5 patients (serious: n=4; non-serious: n=1), with 4 TB events considered treatment-related. Incidence rate 0.1 per 100 PY. | |
Post-marketing: In ~114,071 PY, 7 patients reported TB (serious: n=5; non-serious: n=2). | |||||
Colombel et al. (2017)60 (and Bye et al. [2017]61) | Review | Review of safety of vedolizumab; n=2,830; 4,811 PY exposure | NA | 4 Reports of TB, i.e. 0.14% of patients. | |
Of the 4, 3 had a negative LTBI screening and developed pulmonary TB (considered to be primary infections); 1 developed LTBI. | |||||
Amiot et al. (2016)62 | Review | Review of safety and efficacy of vedolizumab in IBD | NA | One patient developed TB despite a negative LTBI screening. | |
Ustekinumab | Cantini et al. (2017)63 | Review | Review of TB reactivation risk in RA, AS and PsA | NA | No cases of active TB reported in 3 clinical trials, both short-term and after 2 years of treatment. |
Across 5 trials in psoriasis and PsA, no active TB in 167 patients who were positive for LTBI. | |||||
No TB cases in 3,474 patients in the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry over median 1.60 years follow-up. | |||||
Tofacitinib | Winthrop et al. (2016)64 | Review | Review of the risk of opportunistic infections with tofacitinib in RA | NA | Within the global tofacitinib RA development program, TB was seen in 26 of 5,671 subjects, with a crude incidence rate of 0.21 per 100 PY (95% CI, 0.14–0.30). |
Cohen et al. (2018)65 | PMS data | Review of worldwide tofacitinib PMS data in RA | NA | During a 3-year reporting period covering 34,223 PY, 4,352 SAEs were reported, of which there were 6 TB SAEs. |
TB, tuberculosis; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; RCT, randomized controlled trial; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence intervals; RR, relative risk; OLE, open label extension; PY, person-year; LTBI, latent tuberculosis infection; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; AS, ankylosing spondylitis; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; PMS, post-marketing surveillance; SAE, serious adverse event.