Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 8;14(6):746–754. doi: 10.5009/gnl20114

Table 1.

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics between the EVAC and SEMS Groups Treated for Anastomotic Leakage

Characteristic Total (n=39) EVAC (n=11) SEMS (n=28) p-value
Age, yr 66.0 (39–82) 68.0 (55–81) 63.5 (39–82) 0.450
ASA
1 or 2 24 (61.5) 6 (54.5) 18 (64.3) 0.718
3 or 4 15 (38.5) 5 (45.5) 10 (35.7) 0.718
Cardiovascular disease 23 (59.0) 9 (81.8) 14 (50.0) 0.086
Diabetes mellitus 10 (25.6) 4 (36.4) 6 (21.4) 0.424
Use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent 14 (35.9) 6 (54.5) 8 (28.6) 0.156
Type of surgery
Total or proximal gastrectomy 28 (73.7) 6 (54.5) 22 (78.6) 0.234
Billroth I or II 11 (28.2) 5 (45.5) 6 (21.4) 0.234
TNM stage
1 or 2 27 (69.2) 9 (81.8) 18 (64.3) 0.446
3 or 4 12 (30.8) 2 (18.2) 10 (35.7) 0.446
Preoperative BMI, kg/m2 24.5 (21.2–26.4) 23.8 (19.8–25.4) 24.6 (22.1–26.5) 0.363
Size of leak, cm 1.5 (1.0–2.0) 2.1 (2.0–3.0) 1.0 (0.8–1.5) <0.001

Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%).

EVAC, endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure; SEMS, self-expandable metallic stent; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI, body mass index.