Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 8;14(6):746–754. doi: 10.5009/gnl20114

Table 2.

Comparison of Therapeutic Outcomes between EVAC and SEMS for Anastomotic Leakage

Outcomes Total (n=39) EVAC (n=11) SEMS (n=28) p-value
Follow-up duration, mo 17.0 (9.0–26.0) 11.0 (1.0–17.0) 19.5 (10.3–35.0) 0.043
Successful closure 37 (94.9) 11 (100.0) 26 (92.9)
26 (74.3)*
>0.999
0.089*
Leak-related mortality 1 (2.6) 0 1 (3.6) >0.999
Duration of therapy, day 31.0 (15.0–46.0) 15.0 (6.0–21.0) 36.0 (28.0–48.0) <0.001
Stent/sponge change or replacement 12 (30.8) 5 (45.5) 7 (25.0) 0.262
Weight loss after treatment, kg 9.0 (6.8–12.0) 8.0 (4.0–11.0) 9.0 (7.0–12.0) 0.356
Antibiotics use
Antibiotics cessation 1 (2.6) 1 (9.1) 0 0.282
Antibiotics duration, day 24.0 (16.0–36.0) 29.0 (15.0–47.0) 23.5 (16.3–34.5) 0.731
Antibiotics step-up 11 (43.6) 0 11 (39.3) 0.017
Antibiotics step-down 3 (7.7) 2 (18.2) 1 (3.6) 0.187
Incidence rate of stricture within 1 yr 5 (12.8) 1 (9.1) 4 (14.3) >0.999

Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%).

EVAC, endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure; SEMS, self-expandable metallic stent.

*Value when seven cases were switched from SEMS to EVAC and classified as SEMS failure; Except one mortality case.