Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 3;14(6):673–684. doi: 10.5009/gnl19266

Table 3.

Clinical Outcomes between Traction-Assisted ESD and Conventional ESD of the Colorectum

Author (year) Traction method Design Cases, n
(study/control)
Tumor size, mm
(study/control)
Procedure time, min
(study/control)
En bloc resection,
% (study/control)
Complete resection,
% (study/control)
Uraoka et al. (2010)36 Double scope Retrospective 21/16 43.6/42.4* 96/116* (p=0.18) 100/100 -
Okamoto et al. (2012)37 Clip line (with balloon overtube) Retrospective 15/15 37.3/36.1* 126/165* (p<0.05) - 93.3/86.6
Ritsuno et al. (2014)38 S-O line RCT 27/23 33.5/37.8* 37.4/67.1* (p=0.03) 100/95.7 (p=0.28) -
Yamada et al. (2016)39 Clip line
(clip-prelooping snare)
Retrospective 17/123 32.5/33.9* 45.6/70.1* (p=0.047) 100/96.7 (p=1) 100/91.1 (p=0.36)
Sakamoto et al. (2017)40 PCM Retrospective 73/53 27/25 19/14, (p=0.03) 100/92 (p=0.03) 93/91 (p=0.74)
Mori et al. (2017)41 Clip line (clip and
ring-shaped thread)
RCT 21/22 27.3/27.6 80/130 (p=0.001) - -
Kanamori et al. (2017)42 PCM Retrospective 47/49 26/30 77/85 (p=0.38) 100/88 (p=0.015) 100/84 (p=0.003)
Yoshida et al. (2018)43 PCM (only for lesions with severe fibrosis) Retrospective 21/99 30.1/34.5* 79.6/118.8* (p<0.001) 95.2/74.7 (p=0.03) 85.7/54.5 (p=0.04)
Yamasaki et al. (2018)44 Clip line (modified) RCT 42/42 37/36, 40/70 (p<0.001) 100/100 93/98 (p=0.3)
Takezawa et al. (2019)45 PCM Retrospective 280/263 35.3/35.7 69.5/78.7*, (p=0.676) 100/96 (p<0.001) 91/85 (p=0.033)
Harada et al. (2019)46 PCM RCT 46/45 32.5/34, 29.5/41 (p<0.001) 100/100 100/100
Ye et al. (2019)47 Magnetic beads Retrospective§ 13/13 589/628, 21/16, (p=0.143) 100/92.3 (p=1.0) 100/93.2 (p=1.0)

ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; RCT, randomized controlled trial; PCM, pocket creation method.

*Mean; Median; Dissection speed (mm2/min); §Propensity score matching; Specimen area (mm2); Specimen size.