Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2020 Jan 20;34(5):543–560. doi: 10.1007/s10822-019-00267-z

Table 7:

Computed (log Pow) and experimental (log Powexp) octanol-water partition coefficients with error estimate for the CGenFF results processed with alchemlyb-MBAR. The same raw data processed with mdpow-TI (Simpson’s rule) were submitted as entry 3oqhx for Protocol Dry (protocol Wet was not submitted), see Table S7 in the Supplementary Information

id Exp. Dry Octanol Wet Octanol
log Powexp log Pow Δ log Pow Δ
SM02 4.09(3) 2.74(20) −1.35(20) 3.39(19) −0.70(19)
SM07 3.21(4) 1.37(15) −1.84(15) 0.88(18) −2.33(18)
SM08 3.1(3) 5.19(21) 2.09(21) 5.69(19) 2.59(19)
SM09 3.03(7) 3.32(16) 0.29(17) 3.09(20) 0.06(21)
SM11 2.1(4) 1.95(20) −0.15(20) 3.14(17) 1.04(17)
SM13 2.92(4) 2.24(21) −0.68(21) 3.0(19) 0.08(19)
SM14 1.95(3) 1.9(23) −0.05(23) 1.92(21) −0.03(21)
SM15 3.07(3) 2.22(21) −0.85(21) 1.52(17) −1.55(17)
RMS Error (RMSE) 1.17(6) 1.42(6)
Absolute Unsigned Error (AUE) 0.91(6) 1.05(6)
Mean Error (ME) −0.32(6) −0.10(6)