Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 1;54(3):144–155.

Table 4.

Quality appraisal and summary of the systematic reviews/meta-analyses (n = 10)

Author (Country)

PRISMA score (max 27)

Heterogeneity

Risk of bias

Quality assessment instrument

Number of RCTs & subjects;

outcome measure

Included meta-analysis

Gu et al. 201216

(China)

24

I2 = 61.1%

Unclear risk of bias

Jadad scale

 

CHBa

4 RCTs, 828 subjects;

toothbrushing, prevention of VAP

Yes

 

Hua et al. 201617 (UK) Cochrane

25

I2 = varies with different comparisons

Low-quality evidence

CHBa

38 RCTs, 6016 subjects; oral health care & incidence of VAP

Yes

Kaneoka et al. 201518 (US)

22.5

I2 = 0%

High risk of bias

CHBa

5 RCTs, 1009 subjects; oral care in preventing pneumonia in non-ventilated patients

Yes

Klompas et al. 201419 (US)

23

I2 = 0% for cardiac surgeries

I2 = 42% for

non-cardiac surgery studies

11 of 16 studies were high quality

Assessed random sequence generation & allocation concealment only

16 RCTs, 3630 subjects; CHX & incidence of VAP;

compared cardiovascular surgery patient outcomes with non-cardiovascular surgery patient outcomes

Yes

Labeau et al. 201120 (Belgium)

23

I2 = 29% for CHX; 67% for Povi-Iod

Not reported

Checklist from Dutch Cochrane

14 RCTs, 2481 subjects; oral antiseptics & prevention of VAP

Yes

Li et al. 201521 (China)

 

23

I2 = 49.7% for CHX; 54.8% for Povi-Iod

Begg's test revealed no publication bias;

Jadad score 4 (high quality)

Jadad scale

 

17 RCTs, 4249 subjects; oral antiseptics & prevention of VAP

Yes

Liu et al. 201822(China) Cochrane

24

Cochrane's Q and I2 = 67%

 

Low to very low quality evidence

 

All studies identified as high risk of bias

CHBa

4 RCTs, 3905/3546 subjects;

oral care & incidence of nursing home acquired pneumonia

Yes

Sjögren et al. 200823

(Sweden)

17

No MA due to heterogeneity of study designs

Jadad scores between 3 and 5 for 3 of the RCTs

Jadad scale

15, of which only 5 studied interventions; 10 were non-RCT

No

Shi et al. 201324 (China) Cochrane

24.5

Chi2 and I2

High = 17, Low = 5, Unclear = 13

CHBa

35 RCTs, 5374 subjects; oral care & prevention of VAP in ICUs

Yes

Villar et al. 201625 (Brazil)

25

I2 = 45%

High = 8, Low = 1, Unclear = 4

CHBa

13 RCTs, 1640 subjects; incidence of VAP

Yes

aCHB (Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions)