Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene logoLink to Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene
. 2020 Oct 1;54(3):124–132.

Oral health knowledge and practice among orthodontic clients in China and New Zealand

Jun Guo *, Lulu Li §, Guangzhao Guan , Florence Bennani §, Li Mei §
PMCID: PMC7668273  PMID: 33240372

Abstract

Background

The oral hygiene habits of clients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances is poorly understood. Assessment of oral hygiene behavioural patterns is essential for understanding clients’ oral health care needs. The aim of this study was to investigate orthodontic clients’ oral hygiene behaviours, brushing techniques, and oral hygiene awareness.

Methods

A total of 200 orthodontic clients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances were consecutively recruited from the Sichuan Provincial Hospital, Chengdu, China, and the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. A 47-item questionnaire was used to survey study participants.

Results

The survey had a 92% response rate, with 67.5% of respondents being female and 32.5% male. Most were non-smokers (94.2%) and the majority (80.0%) brushed their teeth twice daily. Most (80.4%) brushed their teeth for 1 to 2 minutes, and 68.7% positioned their toothbrush both horizontally and vertically, with horizontal being the preferred direction of motion. One-third (33.5%) did not use any auxiliary oral hygiene aids; most snacked between meals; only 31.4% received professional tooth cleaning during orthodontic treatment; and 56.8% experienced an increased level of halitosis after appliance placement. Most respondents (79.4%) thought their oral hygiene was good, but 51.0% reported bleeding gums during tooth brushing, 31.4% found they rarely bled, and only 17.6% reported no bleeding. Most respondents agreed that good oral health was very important for orthodontic treatment and that their own efforts were the most important factors.

Conclusions

Client awareness of the importance of oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment requires improvement. Clinician reinforcement of oral hygiene should become a priority for orthodontic clients.

Keywords: braces, fixed appliances, oral hygiene, orthodontics

INTRODUCTION

It is important for clients to maintain good oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment because poor oral hygiene can cause side effects, such as enamel demineralization, gingival inflammation, and halitosis, negatively affecting their quality of life.1 The placement of orthodontic appliances not only promotes biofilm accumulation but also increases the level of cariogenic bacteria within the dental biofilm, resulting in an increased risk of biofilm-related side effects (e.g., enamel demineralization).2 Even though the majority of clients report daily oral hygiene, the prevalence of biofilm-related oral diseases still remains high among orthodontic clients.1, 3

It has been shown that oral hygiene behaviour and compliance play an important role in the prevention of biofilm formation.4, 5 For example, the modified Bass technique is often recommended by oral health professionals and in numerous textbooks. However, there is wide variation in the toothbrushing techniques used by the population, with most people brushing their teeth using simple horizontal and circular strokes.6-10 In a video observation study of toothbrushing and flossing behaviour in young adults, a significant neglect of brushing oral surfaces and insufficient use of floss was reported.6 A Swedish study demonstrated that clients’ attitudes towards and behaviours relating to fluoride toothpaste use and toothbrushing habits were significantly inadequate even after 2 years of toothpaste intervention. The majority of study subjects indicated “fresh breath” as their prime motivation for performing oral hygiene. Dental professionals could perhaps appeal to this motivating factor during health promotion efforts.11 However, these studies were performed on subjects without orthodontic appliances. To date, no specific information could be found for orthodontic clients.

The oral hygiene behaviour of clients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances is not well documented and thus poorly understood. An assessment of behavioural patterns in oral hygiene practices among orthodontic clients is essential for understanding their oral health care needs.12 Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the oral hygiene behaviours, brushing techniques, and oral hygiene awareness of clients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was designed as a 2-centre cross-sectional survey and approved by the Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital Ethics Committee and the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (17/101). Verbal consent was obtained from each study participant over 16 years of age or their parent for those under 16 years. A total of 200 orthodontic clients were consecutively recruited from the Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital (n = 120) and University of Otago (n = 80). The determination of sample size was based on previous cross-sectional studies13,14 by setting type I error at 0.05 and type II error at 0.20 (80% power). To account for possible dropouts during the study, we aimed to recruit 200 participants. The inclusion criteria were clients wearing full, fixed orthodontic appliances for at least 1 month in upper and lower dental arches, and willingness to participate in the study. The exclusion criteria were individuals wearing lingual fixed appliances, those with extensive dental restorations, active periodontal disease, craniofacial syndromes, hypodontia, oligondontia or cleft lip/palate syndromes.

A hard copy of a 47-item questionnaire was distributed in person to each client or parent to survey the client’s oral hygiene behaviours, brushing techniques, and oral hygiene awareness (i.e., the client’s attitude towards and knowledge of oral hygiene). The initial version of this questionnaire was designed in consultation with senior orthodontic and public health academics and researchers at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago.15,16 After an initial pilot interview, the data were analysed and necessary modifications were made to generate the final version of survey questions (Appendix).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 23.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago IL). Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed, or as the median and quartiles if they had a skewed distribution. Categorical variables were described as counts and percentages and compared using the Chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 184 participants completed the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 92%. The mean age of clients included in the study was 16.2 ± 4.3 years (67.5% female and 32.5% male). Most participants were studying in secondary schools (63.5%) and were non-smokers (94.2%).

Oral hygiene behaviour

The majority of study participants (85.1%) used a manual toothbrush; 14.9% used an electric toothbrush ( p = 0.016) (Figure 1). More than half of the participants (60.2%) preferred a toothbrush with soft bristles, 21.0% preferred a toothbrush with hard bristles, and 18.8% preferred a toothbrush with medium bristles ( p = 0.023). About half of the participants (49.7%) changed their toothbrushes every 3 months, 21.2% changed their toothbrushes monthly, and 29.1% changed their toothbrushes every 6 months. Most participants (88.6%) used fluoridated toothpaste, 2.8% used non-fluoridated toothpaste, and the rest of the participants (8.6%) were not sure ( p = 0.011). The majority of the participants (80.0%) brushed their teeth twice daily, while 9.0% brushed more than twice daily ( p = 0.037). Most of the participants (80.4%) brushed their teeth for 1 to 2 minutes. Only 19.2% of the participants performed tongue cleaning while brushing their teeth.

Only a small number of study participants used interdental brushes (15.3%), dental floss (10.2%), and mouth rinse (35.0%) during their daily oral hygiene ( p = 0.016). About one-third of participants (33.5%) did not use any auxiliary cleaning tool (i.e., interdental brush or floss) apart from a toothbrush. Less than one-third of participants (31.4%) received professional tooth cleaning during their orthodontic treatment. A majority of participants snacked between meals, with 31.5% snacking more than twice daily, 40.2% twice daily, and 28.3% once daily ( p = 0.045) (Figure 1).

Brushing techniques

Insofar as brushing techniques were concerned, 33.3% of the participants chose a random area to start toothbrushing, 68.7% positioned their toothbrush both horizontally and vertically, 29.3% and 2.0% used them horizontally or vertically, respectively ( p = 0.029) (Figure 2). Most participants (60.8%) brushed their teeth with a combination of repetitive small and large strokes, 27.5% and 11.7% used only small repetitive strokes or large strokes, respectively ( p = 0.043). Horizontal motion was the most preferred movement ( p = 0.002) on all teeth surfaces except for the inner surface of the front teeth, where 16.8% preferred a vertical motion and 12.6% preferred a circling motion (Figure 2). More than half (54.9%) of the study participants preferred to rinse and spit after toothbrushing, while the rest (45.1%) preferred to spit only ( p = 0.252). Lower posterior teeth were considered the most difficult to clean (58.9%), followed by upper posterior teeth (37.3%) ( p = 0.041).

Figure 1.

 Figure 1.

Oral hygiene behaviours

Figure 2.

 Figure 2.

Toothbrushing techniques

Oral hygiene awareness

Most of the participants (79.4%) described their oral hygiene as good; only 2.0% described their oral hygiene as poor ( p = 0.024) (Figure 3). Fifty-six percent (56.0%) of participants considered their knowledge of oral health to be fair; only 19.7% reported that their knowledge of oral health was quite poor. Close to three-quarters (72.5%) of the participants agreed that good oral health was very important for orthodontic treatment. About half (51.0%) of the participants reported their gum sometimes bled during toothbrushing, 31.4% found they rarely bled, and only 17.6% reported never bleeding. A majority of participants (84.3%) believed the most important factor for their oral health was their own efforts, and 11.8% considered both their own efforts and professional dental services to be important ( p = 0.011).

About half of the participants (51.2%) claimed that their oral hygiene improved after orthodontic treatment, while 31.4% reported that their oral hygiene was the same, and 17.4% reported that their oral hygiene was worse after orthodontic treatment ( p = 0.043). About half of the participants (56.8%) reported an increased level of halitosis after the placement of orthodontic appliances ( p = 0.033) (Figure 3).

DISCUSSION

Some studies have reported that the placement of fixed appliances impedes toothbrushing and promotes biofilm formation in orthodontic clients.2,3 Baseline information of clients’ oral hygiene behaviours is useful for the oral hygiene management and prevention of caries during orthodontic treatment. This study found that most participants used manual toothbrushes and brushed their teeth at least twice daily with fluoridated toothpastes. The majority of participants did not use auxiliary cleaning tools (i.e ., interdental toothbrushes and floss) during orthodontic treatment although these auxiliary tools were provided to clients for free at their first orthodontic bonding appointment. Preferred brushing techniques included horizontal and vertical motions; a horizontal motion; and a combination of small and large strokes. Most participants reported their oral hygiene as good with a fair amount oral health knowledge. The most important factor that affected their oral health might be their own efforts. Although half of the study participants noticed an improvement in their oral health after orthodontic treatment, no improvement in their halitosis was reported.

Interestingly, while only 2.0% of the study participants thought their oral hygiene was poor, the majority reported gingival bleeding during tooth brushing. This finding confirms a lack of awareness of their oral hygiene status, which was in fact poor, based on their reported bleeding of their gums.

Most of the participants in the study reported using soft-bristled manual toothbrushes with fluoridated toothpaste. Although hard-bristled toothbrushes have been shown to remove more dental plaque, they have also been reported to cause more gingival abrasion than soft-bristled toothbrushes.17,18 The amount of plaque removal, however, is mainly dependent on the toothbrushing technique and time spent on brushing rather than bristle hardness. Most participants brushed twice daily, with a self-reported duration between 60 and 180 seconds, which is similar to findings from other studies.8,19-21

Figure 3.

 Figure 3.

Oral hygiene awareness

Although the use of auxiliary aids such as floss and interdental brushes were reported by only 25% of participants, it was interesting to note that a higher percentage reported using interdental brushes (15.3%) than floss (10.2%). This finding is congruent with results obtained by Da’Ameh et al.22 , in whose study 14.4% reported using interdental toothbrushes. However, it was lower than in other studies, which reported between 23.3% and 68.6% of subjects using interdental brushes.20,23

Findings from the present study revealed a higher number of individuals (35%) reporting a preference for use of mouthrinses as another form of plaque control during orthodontic treatment. Several other studies have reported lower percentages of mouthrinse use, ranging from 25.9% to 32.6%.20,22,23 In addition, the present study found that a majority of participants snack at least once a day between meals. One disturbing finding was the lack of professional cleanings during orthodontic treatment, which is similar to findings of previous studies.23,24 As suggested by Lee et al.23 , lack of awareness, motivation, and a failure to understand the need for dental hygiene therapy could be reasons for poor oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment.

A recent study by Mei et al.13 investigating the factors affecting the accumulation of oral biofilm in orthodontic clients reported that study subjects were able to clean the occlusal surfaces (in relation to the bracket) of the teeth better than the gingival, mesial, and distal areas. Unfortunately, the most critical sites for biofilm accumulation are the areas cervical to the brackets and underneath the orthodontic archwires (i.e . , areas mesial and distal to the brackets).13 Therefore, clients wearing orthodontic appliances should be instructed to clean these areas in particular. Other aids such as plaque-disclosing agents and other visual methods should be employed to motivate and educate clients.14 Several studies have also reported success with behaviour change techniques such as motivational interviewing to assist orthodontic clients in achieving better plaque control. Recommended techniques should be based on the client’s age and individual case.

Although the modified Bass technique has been the most commonly recommended toothbrushing technique by dental professionals and dental associations,9,10 neither the Bass toothbrushing technique nor the Modified Bass toothbrushing techniques were observed in a study of uninstructed adults.25 Circular brushing motion was reported as the most preferred habitual toothbrushing motion.25 It has been reported that study subjects brushed different areas of the mouth with different types of strokes, predominantly with horizontal and circular strokes on the buccal and labial surfaces, horizontal strokes on posterior teeth, and vertical strokes on anterior teeth in non-orthodontics clients.6 In the present study, participants reported mostly using horizontal motions to clean their teeth and appliances; this finding may be due to the practical convenience and the limited space between the braces and gingival margin or to a lack of knowledge of other techniques. Although spitting without rinsing after toothbrushing with fluoridated toothpaste has been shown in studies to preserve fluoride relatively longer in the oral cavity,26 more than half of the participants in this study did not indicate doing so. The majority of participants in previous studies13,14 claimed that the oral hygiene instruction given before and during orthodontic treatment was not specific and practical enough, indicating the need to reinforce oral hygiene instruction, especially visually aided approaches, in clients wearing orthodontic appliances. This finding is in agreement with our study findings.

In the present study, participants’ awareness of their oral hygiene status was not encouraging as the majority were satisfied with their own oral hygiene, even though more than half of the participants had unsatisfactory oral hygiene according to the literature.3,13 Our research finding is similar to a previous study from Sweden, in which 90% of subjects were found to have poor oral health knowledge. Despite the subjects’ attitude towards their oral hygiene status and their oral hygiene knowledge, they believed their oral hygiene was satisfactory.27

Limitations

There are some limitations to this study. Although the study was carried out in 2 clinical centres, the sample size was small. Future studies could consider broadening the recruitment range to account for potential influences of demographic and socioeconomic factors on participants’ oral hygiene behaviour. In addition, the frequency of visiting dental hygienists and dentists may also cause potential bias in reinforcing oral hygiene instruction. Since the course of orthodontic treatment is relatively long, it would be interesting to repeat and compare the questionnaire at the beginning and end of orthodontic treatment to identify whether oral hygiene behaviours change over time. Future studies could also consider both quantitative and qualitative methodologies for data collection and analysis to identify possible results not covered by a survey questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

Most study participants brushed their teeth twice daily with a soft manual toothbrush and fluoridated toothpaste but were not fully aware of their oral hygiene status. Clinicians should improve their clients’ awareness of their oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment. Reinforcement of oral hygiene instruction is recommended in all cases of orthodontic treatment.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

APPENDIX

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Footnotes

CDHA Research Agenda category: risk assessment and management

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wishney M. Potential risks of orthodontic therapy: Acritical review and conceptual framework. Aust Dent J 2017;62 Suppl 1:86–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chang HS, Walsh LJ, Freer TJ. The effect of orthodontic treatment on salivary flow, pH, buffer capacity, and levels of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli. Aust Orthod J 1999;15(4):229–234 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ren Y, Jongsma MA, Mei L, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and biofilm formation-a potential public health threat? Clin Oral Investig 2014;18(7):1711–1718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fornell AC, Skold-Larsson K, Hallgren A, Bergstrand F, Twetman S. Effect of a hydrophobic tooth coating on gingival health, mutans streptococci, and enamel demineralization in adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances. Acta Odontol Scand 2002;60(1):37–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Karadas M, Cantekin K, Celikoglu M. Effects of orthodontic treatment with a fixed appliance on the caries experience of patients with high and low risk of caries. J Dent Sci 2011;6(4):195–199 [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Winterfeld T, Schlueter N, Harnacke D, Illig J, Margraf-Stiksrud J, Deinzer R, et al. Toothbrushing and flossing behaviour in young adults—a video observation. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19(4):851–858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Deinzer R, Cordes O, Weber J, Hassebrauck L, Weik U, Norbert Krämer, et al. Toothbrushing behavior in children—an observational study of toothbrushing performance in 12-year-olds. BMC Oral Health 2019;19(1):68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Wainwright J, Sheiham A. An analysis of methods of toothbrushing recommended by dental associations, toothpaste and toothbrush companies and in dental texts. Br Dent J 2014;217:E5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Poyato-Ferrera M, Segura-Egea JJ, Bullón-Fernández P. Comparison of modified Bass technique with normal toothbrushing practices for efficacy in supragingival plaque removal. Int J Dent Hyg 2003;1(2):110–114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Janakiram C, Varghese N, Venkitachalam R, Joseph J, Vineetha K. Comparison of modified Bass, Fones and normal tooth brushing technique for the efficacy of plaque control in young adults: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Exp Dent 2020;12(2):e123– [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Nordstrom A, Birkhed D. Attitudes and behavioural factors relating to toothbrushing and the use of fluoride toothpaste among caries-active Swedish adolescents—a questionnaire study. Acta Odontol Scand 2017;75(7):483–487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization Part 1 Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94(1):68–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mei L, Chieng J, Wong C, Benic G, Farella M. Factors affecting dental biofilm in patients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances. Prog Orthod 2017;18(1):4–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Peng Y, Wu R, Qu W, Wu W, Chen J, Fang J, et al. Effect of visual method vs plaque disclosure in enhancing oral hygiene in adolescents and young adults: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145(3):280–286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Tan A, Bennani F, Thomson WM, Farella F, Mei L. A qualitative study of orthodontic screening and referral practices among dental therapists in New Zealand. Aust Orthod J 2016;32(2):155–164 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Soma KJ, Thomson WM, Morgaine KC, Harding WJ. A qualitative investigation of specialist orthodontists in New Zealand Part I Orthodontists and orthodontic practice. Aust Orthod J 2012;28:2–16 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zanatta FB, Bergoli AD, Werle SB, Antoniazzi RP. Biofilm removal and gingival abrasion with medium and soft toothbrushes. Oral Health Prev Dent 2011;9(2):177–183 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zimmer S, Öztürk M, Barthel CR, Bizhang M, Jordan RA. Cleaning efficacy and soft tissue trauma after use of manual toothbrushes with different bristle stiffness. J Periodontol 2011;82(2):267–271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Al-Shammari KF, Al-Ansari JM, Al-Khabbaz AK, Dashti A, Honkala EJ. Self-reported oral hygiene habits and oral health problems of Kuwaiti adults. Med Princ Pract 2007;16(1):15–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Al-Shdeifat N, Al-Alawneh A, Al-Zyood ALI, Al-Maani M. Oral hygiene practices among fixed orthodontic patients in Az-zarqa, Jordan. Pakistan Oral Dent J 2016;36(3):404–407 [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hayasaki H, Saitoh I, Nakakura-Ohshima K, Hanasaki M, Nogami Y, Nakajima T, et al. Tooth brushing for oral prophylaxis. Japanese Dent Sci Rev 2014;50(3):69–77 [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Da’Ameh DA, Al-Shorman I, Al-Shdeifat N, Fnaish M. Oral hygiene measures in orthodontic treatment in northern Jordan. Pakistan Oral Dent J 2011;31(2):336–339 [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lee J, Asma A, Nurul Y. Oral hygiene practices among fixed orthodontic patients in a university dental setting. Int J Oral Dent Health 2016;2:22–27 [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Atassi F, Awartani F. Oral hygiene status among orthodontic patients. J Contemp Dent Pract 2010;11(4):E025– [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ganss C, Schlueter N, Preiss S, Klimek J. Tooth brushing habits in uninstructed adults—Frequency, technique, duration and force. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13(2):203–208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Pitts N, Duckworth RM, Marsh P, Mutti B, Parnell C, Zero D. Post-brushing rinsing for the control of dental caries: Exploration of the available evidence to establish what advice we should give our patients. Br Dent J 2012;212(7):315–320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ericsson JS, Ostberg AL, Wennstrom JL, Abrahamsson KH. Oral health-related perceptions, attitudes, and behavior in relation to oral hygiene conditions in an adolescent population. Eur J Oral Sci 2012;120(4):335–341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Articles from Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Canadian Dental Hygienists Association

RESOURCES