Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;54(2):92–100.

Table 3.

Adverse pregnancy outcomes screened articles included and deleted

 

Included

 

Deleted

Reason for deletion

 

1.

Iheozor-Ejiofor et al.

2017 14 (15 RCTs)

(Cochrane Review)

 

Spivakovsky 2018 25 (critical summary of Iheozor-Ejiofor, Cochrane)

Duplicate (critical summary)

2.

Polyzos et al. 2010 15

(1 RCT) (Greece)

 

Baccaglini 2011 26 (critical summary of Polyzos)

Duplicate (critical summary)

3.

Kim et al. 2012 16

(12 RCTs...6 post-2008) (US)

 

Dasanyake 2013 27 (critical summary of Kim)

Duplicate (critical summary)

4.

Chambrone et al. 2011 17

(13 RCTs) (Brazil)

 

Leader 2011 28 (critical summary of Chambrone)

Duplicate (critical summary)

5.

Rangel-Rincón et al. 2018 18

2-4 above included in this umbrella review (18 SRs, 19 intervention studies) (Columbia)

 

Vivares-Builes et al. 2018 29

(Columbia)

99 SRs but all observational studies. Purpose was to establish association.

6.

Shah et al. 2013 19

(SR of 13 RCTs) (India)

 

Corbella et al. 2016 30

(Italy)

All case-control or cohort studies

7.

da Silva et al. 2017 20 (4 RCTs)

(Brazil)

 

 

Daalderop et al. 2018 31

(The Netherlands)

23 SRs but all studies were cohort, case-control or CS

8.

Schwendicke et al.

2015 21 (13 RCTs)

(Germany, US, Denmark)

 

Ide et al. 2013 32

No intervention studies

9.

Lopez et al. 2015 22

(SR of 6 meta-analyses)

 

 

 

10.

 

 

Abati et al. 2013 33

Only case-control studies

11.

 

 

Teshome et al. 2016 34

Only case-control studies

12.

 

 

Macones et al. 2010 35

Editorial of Polyzos

13.

 

 

Otomo-Corgel et al. 2012 36

Literature review