Table 2.
Summary of the results of the best models.
Model | Validation set results | Test set results | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACC | F1 | SEN | PREC | AUC | ACC | F1 SEN PREC | AUC | |||
CPE | 0.794 | 0.794 | 0.794 | 0.795 | 0.794 | 0.725 | 0.725 | 0.726 | 0.727 | 0.725 |
cytotox | 0.771 | 0.771 | 0.771 | 0.772 | 0.771 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
AlphaLISA | 0.788 | 0.788 | 0.788 | 0.79 | 0.789 | 0.762 | 0.762 | 0.762 | 0.762 | 0.762 |
TruHit | 0.762 | 0.762 | 0.762 | 0.762 | 0.762 | 0.727 | 0.727 | 0.727 | 0.727 | 0.727 |
ACE2 | 0.806 | 0.805 | 0.804 | 0.812 | 0.804 | 0.452 | 0.452 | 0.453 | 0.453 | 0.452 |
3CL | 0.803 | 0.802 | 0.803 | 0.81 | 0.803 | 0.672 | 0.671 | 0.671 | 0.672 | 0.671 |
ACC, Accuracy; F1, F1 score; SEN, sensitivity; PREC, precision; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.