Table 4.
Multiple linear regression analysis of the 52-week changes in liver chemistries on histologic improvement, controlling for treatment group, baseline liver chemistries, age, sex, and BMI z-score
| β | 95% CI | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Histologic improvement (yes vs. no) | −29.9 | −51.3, −8.5 | 0.006 |
| Treatment group (Cyst vs. Plbo) | −20.4 | −39.4, −1.3 | 0.04 |
| Baseline ALT (U/L) | −0.5 | −0.6, −0.4 | <0.001 |
| Baseline age (years) | −0.01 | −3.6, 3.6 | 1.00 |
| Sex (male vs. female) | −10.6 | −31.0, 9.9 | 0.31 |
| Baseline BMI z-score | 33.3 | 12.1, 54.4 | 0.002 |
| 52-week change in BMI z-score | 61.3 | 17.3, 105.4 | 0.007 |
| Intercept | −11.8 | ||
| Outcome: Δ AST (52-week-BL, U/L) | |||
| Histologic improvement (yes vs. no) | −10.8 | −22.7, 1.2 | 0.08 |
| Treatment group (Cyst vs. Plbo) | −13.6 | −24.3, −2.8 | 0.01 |
| Baseline AST (U/L) | −0.6 | −0.7, −0.4 | <0.001 |
| Baseline age (years) | −0.8 | −2.8, 1.2 | 0.42 |
| Sex (male vs. female) | −7.8 | −19.3, 3.7 | 0.18 |
| Baseline BMI z-score | 15.3 | 3.4, 27.1 | 0.01 |
| 52-week change in BMI z-score | 26.2 | 1.5, 50.9 | 0.04 |
| Intercept | 14.2 | ||
| Outcome: Δ GGT (52-week-BL, U/L) | |||
| Histologic improvement (yes vs. no) | −12.8 | −18.9, −6.6 | <0.001 |
| Treatment group (Cyst vs. Plbo) | −6.1 | −11.5, −0.6 | 0.03 |
| Baseline GGT (U/L) | −0.3 | −0.4, −0.2 | <0.001 |
| Baseline age (years) | 0.7 | −0.3, 1.8 | 0.17 |
| Sex (male vs. female) | 0.3 | −5.6, 6.2 | 0.92 |
| Baseline BMI z-score | 3.5 | −2.7, 9.7 | 0.27 |
| 52-week change in BMI z-score | 14.0 | 1.3, 26.8 | 0.03 |
| Intercept | −3.4 |