Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: Hypertens Pregnancy. 2020 Jul 10;39(4):399–404. doi: 10.1080/10641955.2020.1793999

A) Circulating NP (n=13), circulating RUPP (n=9), circulating RUPP + ETAN (n=9). B) Placental NP (n=5), placental RUPP (n=6), placental RUPP + ETAN (n=3). C) Renal NP (n=12), renal RUPP (n=11), renal RUPP + ETAN (n=6). Activated NK cells were quantified using flowcytometry. Statistical differences were achieved using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc analysis, *p < 0.05 vs NP and ⁺p < 0.05 vs. RUPP.

A) Circulating NP (n=13), circulating RUPP (n=9), circulating RUPP + ETAN (n=9). B) Placental NP (n=5), placental RUPP (n=6), placental RUPP + ETAN (n=3). C) Renal NP (n=12), renal RUPP (n=11), renal RUPP + ETAN (n=6). Activated NK cells were quantified using flowcytometry. Statistical differences were achieved using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc analysis, *p < 0.05 vs NP and ⁺p < 0.05 vs. RUPP.