Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 23;27(13):5296–5302. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08744-8

Table 2.

Surgical resection margin status and additional surgery [n = 4038]

RSL
[n = 1851 (45.8%)]
WGL
[n = 2187 (54.6%)]
p value
Resection margins, cm [mean (SD)] 0.33 (0.29) 0.35 (0.30) 0.089
Resection_margins_cat
  < 2 mm 984 (53.2) 1142 (52.2) 0.505
  ≥ 2 mm 856 (46.2) 1038 (47.5)
 Unknowna 11 (0.6) 7 (0.3)
Radicality
 Free 1451 (78.4) 1699 (77.7) 0.531
 Focally not radical 253 (13.7) 314 (14.4)
 More than focally not radical 136 (7.3) 167 (7.6)
 Unknowna 11 (0.6) 7 (0.3)
First re-excision
 Yes 234 (12.6) 296 (13.5) 0.429
 No 1617 (87.4) 1891 (86.5)
Type of first re-excision
 Breast-conserving surgery 162 (69.2) 176 (59.5) 0.029
 Mastectomy 72 (30.8) 119 (40.2)
 Unknowna 0 1 (0.3)
Findings in first re-excision specimen
 No rest 80 (34.2) 103 (34.8) 0.888
 DCIS 147 (62.8) 186 (62.8)
 LCIS 1 (0.4) 2 (0.7)
Invasive carcinoma 6 (2.6) 5 (1.7)
Second re-excision
 Yes 18 (7.7) 26 (8.8) 0.769
 No 216 (92.3) 270 (91.2)
Type of second re-excision
 Breast-conserving surgery 2 (11.1) 2 (7.7) 1
 Mastectomy 16 (88.9) 24 (92.3)
Findings in second re-excision specimen
 DCIS 17 (94.4) 26 (100.0) 0.852
 No rest 1 (5.6) 0 (0.0)

Data are expressed as n (%) unless otherwise specified

RSL radioactive seed localization, WGL wire-guided localization, SD standard deviation, DCIS ductal carcinoma in situ, LCIS lobular carcinoma in situ

aExcluded from the analysis

Bolded p-values indicate significance