Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 11;35(6):898–906. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10092-4

Table 2.

Multivariable analysis with mean differences in velocity (m/s) and contraction wave speed for each fluid and technique

Velocity (m/s) Velocity of contraction wave speed (m/s)
Parameter Estimate (95% CI) p value Estimate (95% CI) p value
Technique: UVP
 Newtonian fluids 0.043 (− 0.199 to 0.285) 0.722 0.013 (− 0.030 to 0.055) 0.554
 Shear thinning fluids 0.092 (− 0.158 to 0.341) 0.462 0.006 (− 0.037 to 0.048) 0.786
 Boger fluids Reference Reference
Technique: XVF
 Newtonian fluid  − 0.036 (− 0.277 to 0.206) 0.768 0.009 (− 0.033 to 0.052) 0.665
 Shear thinning fluid 0.119 (− 0.122 to 0.361) 0.325 0.008 (− 0.034 to 0.051) 0.696
 Boger fluid Reference Reference
Technique: XVF compared to UVP
 Newtonian fluid: XVF  − 0.234 (− 0.476 to 0.007) 0.057  − 0.037 (− 0.080 to 0.005) 0.083
 UVP Reference Reference
 Shear thinning fluid: XVF  − 0.128 (− 0.378 to 0.121) 0.306  − 0.031 (− 0.074 to 0.011) 0.143
 UVP Reference Reference
 Boger fluid: XVF  − 0.156 (− 0.397 to 0.086) 0.201  − 0.034 (− 0.076 to 0.009) 0.114
 UVP Reference Reference

UVP ultrasound velocity profiling, XVF X-ray video-fluoroscopy