Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 16;10:19846. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76806-8

Table 1.

ANOVA results testing the effects of species (sp), expression (exp) and interaction (int) on the amplitude of evoked responses.

Effect Ch Latency (ms) p min p max HH NH AH HD ND AD
exp F4 29–37 0.014 0.039 − 0.038 0.146 − 0.308 0.183 0.434 − 1.199
sp F4 45–100 0.003 0.035 − 0.515 − 0.756 − 0.932 0.123 0.462 0.117
sp P4 68–80 0.005 0.023 − 1.057 − 0.160 − 0.646 1.087 1.068 0.109
sp T4 76–88 0.012 0.029 − 1.273 − 0.530 − 1.434 − 0.533 0.482 0.507
exp T3 127–135 0.027 0.049 − 1.094 0.758 − 0.654 − 1.866 2.040 − 0.427
exp P3 158–162 0.011 0.027 2.386 − 1.659 0.377 1.227 − 0.940 0.050
sp T4 201–205 0.035 0.038 0.465 − 0.645 0.045 1.619 1.470 0.927
int F3 209–213 0.013 0.019 1.903 0.622 1.714 0.705 1.275 1.095
exp P3 229–236 0.017 0.031 − 0.710 1.047 − 1.193 − 0.273 0.404 − 2.051

Subsequent significant time points are reported within the same temporal window, and the significant results are shown as average response amplitudes (µV) across the window. The results are listed in the ascending order according to the onset of the time window.

HH happy humans, NH neutral humans, AH aggressive humans, HD happy dogs, ND neutral dogs, AD aggressive dogs.