Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 15;12(1):2560. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2560

TABLE 3.

Results of weighted logistic regression with odds ratios of end-line relative to baseline and intervention relative to control group for selected items.

Item Response End-line relative to baseline
Intervention group relative to control group
Group
OR p Period OR p
A. Did a member of staff attend to you within 15 min of arriving at the unit? Yes Control 6.098 0.0007*** Baseline 1.204 0.2775
Intervention 8.418 0.0001*** End-line 1.662 0.1434
B. Did the sister ask if it was okay to examine you? Yes Control 0.987 0.9599 Baseline 0.462 < 0.0001***
Intervention 2.381 0.0018*** End-line 1.114 0.6748
C. Did any staff member say anything that upset you? No Control 0.904 0.9725 Baseline 0.838 0.7136
Intervention 1.215 0.8760 End-line 1.127 0.8493
D. How did the staff speak to you during labour? All staff spoke nicely Control 1.801 0.1530 Baseline 0.568 < 0.0001***
Intervention 3.172 0.0009*** End-line 1.000 0.9990
E. How respectfully do you think the sisters treated you during your stay in the labour ward? A lot of respect Control 1.690 0.1079 Baseline 0.443 < 0.0001***
Intervention 4.334 < 0.0001*** End-line 1.137 0.3602
F. How satisfied were you with the treatment you received in the labour ward? Completely satisfied Control 1.763 0.0736 Baseline 0.525 < 0.0001***
Intervention 4.044 < 0.0001*** End-line 1.204 0.1868
***

, Significant at 1% level.

, Modelling of responses: Item A: Yes versus No; Item B: Yes versus No; Item C: No versus Yes; Item D: All staff spoke nicely versus Not all staff spoke nicely; Item E: A lot of respect versus Not a lot of respect; Item F: Completely satisfied versus Not completely satisfied.

, Adjusted p value = Exceedance probability for accepting H0: OR = 1 of ad hoc tests (end-line relative to baseline) and (intervention relative to control).