Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 26;76(1):1420. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v76i1.1420

TABLE 3.

Changes in trunk neuromuscular activation and postural control during balance standing task with trunk external load.

Variables Groups (n = 10) Time of intervention
Clinical difference Groups p Times p Interaction p
Initial (1) Immediate (2) 15 days (3)
% MU-L5 HVLA 23.4 (14.7) 25.3 (15.1) 25.0 (16.1) +1.6 0.136 0.888 0.998
MET 28.9 (11.6) 31.0 (14.2) 31.1 (15.9) +2.2 - - -
% ILC-L3 HVLA 25.5 (15.1) 27.0 (14.8) 22.0 (11.9) −3.5 0.329 0.407 0.961
MET 23.6 (9.8) 23.0 (10.7) 18.7 (7.6) −4.9 - - -
% RABD HVLA 10.6 (7.7) 11.4 (7.2) 10.8 (5.9) +0.2 0.219 0.875 0.973
MET 12.9 (3.6) 13.5 (5.2) 12.3 (5.8) −0.6 - - -
% CO-ATIV HVLA 71.4 (58.7) 68.7 (69.4) 67.2 (47.8) −4.2 0.116 0.999 0.952
MET 47.8 (26.1) 50.2 (24.7) 52.7 (26.5) +4.9 - - -
A-COP (cm2) HVLA 0.9 (0.4) 0.9 (0.4) 0.9 (0.4) 0.0 0.202 0.830 0.614
MET 1.1 (0.4) 1.0 (0.4) 0.9 (0.4) −0.2 - - -
VEL A/P (cm/s) HVLA 0.8 (0.1) 0.8 (0.1) 0.8 (0.1) 0.0 0.655 0.694 0.499
MET 0.8 (0.1) 0.9 (0.07) 0.8 (0.1) 0.0 - - -
VEL M/L (cm/s) HVLA 0.5 (0.07) 0.5 (0.06) 0.5 (0.07) 0.0 0.546 0.789 0.951
MET 0.5 (0.07) 0.5 (0.06) 0.5 (0.06) 0.0 - - -

% MU-L5, percentage of activation of multifidus muscle at the L5; % ILC-L3, percentage of activation of ilicostalis at the L3; % RABD, percentage of activation of abdominal muscle; % CO-ATIV, percentage of activation from relationship between abdominal and multifidus muscles; A-COP, centre of pressure area sway; HVLA, high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation; MET, muscle energy technique; VEL A/P e M/L, velocity sway of COP in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions.

Note: Mean values and standard deviation are given in parenthesis. Clinical difference is detectable: positive values for increase in activation and negative values for decrease in activation and balance control.