Skip to main content
. 2020 May 1;14(4):1067–1079. doi: 10.1007/s12105-020-01166-8

Table 3.

Direct sequencing and PCR group—combined statistics

Direct sequencing group
Study Direct method Total PTCs TP TN FP FN Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy PPV NPV
Bullock (2012) Direct (Sanger) 96 59 28 9 0 100.00% 75.68% 90.63% 86.76% 100.00%
Capper (2011) Direct (Sanger)
Dvorak (2014) Direct (Sanger) 73 52 19 2 0 100.00% 90.48% 97.26% 96.30% 100.00%
Ghossein (2013) Mass spectrometry 31 15 16 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Fisher (2013) Pyro 25 10 11 4 0 100.00% 73.33% 84.00% 71.43% 100.00%
Kim (2014) Direct (Sanger) 91 56 16 12 7 88.89% 57.14% 79.12% 82.35% 69.57%
Kim (2014) Pyro Seq 91 56 14 12 9 86.15% 53.85% 76.92% 82.35% 60.87%
Kim (2018) Direct (Sanger) 697 581 70 46 0 100.00% 60.34% 93.40% 92.66% 100.00%
Koperek (2012) Direct (Sanger)
Loo (2018) Direct (Sanger) 12 5 7 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Martinuzzi (2016) Direct (Sanger) 85 54 23 8 0 100.00% 74.19% 90.59% 87.10% 100.00%
Oh (2018) Direct (Sanger) 23 16 5 2 0 100.00% 71.43% 91.30% 88.89% 100.00%
Qiu (2015) Direct (Sanger) 127 100 25 2 0 100.00% 92.59% 98.43% 98.04% 100.00%
ZagZag (2013) Direct (Sanger) 37 25 9 0 3 89.29% 100.00% 91.89% 100.00% 75.00%
Zhao (2019) Direct (Sanger) 185 140 43 1 1 99.29% 97.73% 98.92% 99.29% 97.73%
Zhu (2016) Direct (Sanger) 118 73 37 8 0 100.00% 82.22% 93.22% 90.12% 100.00%
PCR based group
Study PCR method Total PTCs TP TN FP FN Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy PPV NPV
Chen (2018) quant-rtPCR 40 34 4 2 0 100.00% 66.67% 95.00% 94.44% 100.00%
de Biase (2014) ASLNA-qPCR 20 18 0 0 2 90.00% 90.00% 100.00% 0.00%
Elmageed (2017) rt-PCR 130 97 28 2 3 97.00% 93.33% 96.15% 97.98% 90.32%
Ilie (2014) SNaPshot
Jung (2015) PCR 467 392 65 9 1 99.75% 87.84% 97.86% 97.76% 98.48%
Kim (2014) PNA clamp 91 56 17 12 6 90.32% 58.62% 80.22% 82.35% 73.91%
Kim (2014) rt-PCR 91 58 15 10 8 87.88% 60.00% 80.22% 85.29% 65.22%
Martinuzzi (2016) PNA-Clamp 85 58 21 2 4 93.55% 91.30% 92.94% 96.67% 84.00%
McKelvie (2013) C-PCR (SNaPshot) 71 49 21 1 0 100.00% 95.45% 98.59% 98.00% 100.00%
Na (2015) rt-PCR 104 71 29 4 0 100.00% 87.88% 96.15% 94.67% 100.00%
PajaFano (2017) rt-PCR
Qiu (2015) rt-PCR 127 100 25 2 0 100.00% 92.59% 98.43% 98.04% 100.00%
Routhier (2013) SNaPshot 15 9 6 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Sun (2015) rt-PCR 556 414 137 0 5 98.81% 100.00% 99.10% 100.00% 96.48%
Szymonek (2017) rt-PCR#1 137 69 46 9 13 84.15% 83.64% 83.94% 88.46% 77.97%
rt-PCR#2 137 80 49 6 2 97.56% 89.09% 94.16% 93.02% 96.08%
Zhang (2018) ARMS-PCR 132 106 21 5 0 100.00% 80.77% 96.21% 95.50% 100.00%
Zhao (2019) PCR 185 142 35 4 4 97.26% 89.74% 95.68% 97.26% 89.74%