Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 30;24(3):145–149. doi: 10.5114/wo.2020.100219

Table 2.

Univariate Cox regression analysis of survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer

Variable OR 95% CI p-value
Age (years ≥ 50) 1.662 0.739–3.739 0.662
Sex (male) 1.796 0.885–3.644 0.105
ECOG PS (≥ 2) 1.049 0.565–1.947 0.880
CEA ≥ 5 (ng/ml) 1.619 0.817–3.209 0.168
CA 19–9 ≥ 37(ng/ml) 1.276 0.643–2.531 0.486
LAR ≥ 5.5 1.427 0.740–2.752 0.288
NLR ≥ 2.25 1.831 1.006–3.333 0.048
PLR ≥ 134.09 1.798 0.977–3.306 0.059
Surgical approach (TG) 1.803 0.988–3.291 0.055
Anastomotic leak 1.212 0.433–3.395 0.714
T status (T3–4) 4.059 1.255–13.131 0.019
Lymph node status (N2–3) 3.134 1.606–6.116 0.001
Metastatic-to-total harvested lymph nodes ratio (%)
1–20
20–50
≥ 51

2.437
4.774
8.051

0.846–7.017
1.728–13.190
2.836–22.852

0.099
0.003
< 0.001
LVI 4.148 1.747–9.852 0.001
Differentiation (poor-signet ring cell) 1.328 0.726–2.430 0.357
Adjuvant therapy 1.946 0.696–5.441 0.205

OR – odds ratio, CI – confidence interval, ECOG PS – Eastern Clinical Oncology Group performance status, CEA – carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19–9 – carbohydrate antigen 19–9, LAR – lactic dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio, NLR – neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, PLR – platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, TG – total gastrectomy, LVI – lymphovascular invasion