Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;2020:1237418. doi: 10.1155/2020/1237418

Table 2.

The most frequent CT findings acquired from the published literature.

Ref. N GGO Crazy-paving pattern Consolidation GGO + consolidation Interlobular septal thickening
Li et al. [38] 83 97.6% (81/83) 36.1% (30) 63.9% (53) 62.7% (52)
Guan et al. [42] 47 100% (47/47) 89.4% (42/47) 63.8% (30/47)
Miao et al. [43] 54 70.4% (38/54) 29.6% (16/54) 22.2% (12/54)
Zhang et al. [44] 60 97% (58/60) 92% (55/60)
Zhang et al. [45] 34 52.9% (18/34) 23.5% (8/34) 8.8% (3/34) 35.3% (12/34)
Gervaise et al. [46] 72 94% (68/72) 38% (27/72) 68% (49/72)
Dai et al. [47] 219 94.5% (207/219) 93.6% (205/219)
Han et al. [34] 108 60.1% (65/108) 39.8% (43/108) 5.5% (6/108) 40.7% (44/108)
Li and Xia [48] 51 35.3% (18/51) 5.9% (3/51) 54.9% (28/51) 70.6% (36/51)
Bernheim et al. [10] 121 61.2% (74/121) 4.9% (6/121)
Zhao et al. [9] 101 86.1% (87/101) 43.6% (44/101) 64.4% (65/101)
Wang et al. [49] 110 27.3% (30/110) 27.3% (30/110) 45.4% (50/110)
Zhou et al. [33] 62 40.3% (25/62) 33.9% (21/62)
Xiong et al. [50] 42 100% (42/42) 81% (34/42) 69% (29/42)
Yoon et al. [51] 9 (40 lesions) 35% (14/40) 10% (4/40) 5% (2/40) 50% (20/40)
Cheng et al. [39] 11 100% (11/11) 54.5% (6/11) 63.6% (7/11)
Zhou et al. [52] 100 (272 CT scans) 28.3% (77/272) 14% (38/272) 28.3% (77/272)
Guan et al. [53] 52 96.2% (50/52) 88.5% (46/52) 78.8% (41/52)
Liu et al. [54] 112 35.7% (40/112) 21.4% (24/112) 13.4% (15/112) 50.9% (57/112) 66.1% (74/112)
Hu et al. [55] 46 39.1% (18/46) 60.9% (28/46) 2.2% (1/46)
Li et al. [56] 131 15.3% (20/131) 3.1% (4/131) 46.6% (61/131) 51.9% (68/131)
Wu et al. [35] 130 53.8% (70/) 76.9% (100) 46.2% (60)
Zhu et al. [57] 72 50% (36) 22.2% (16) 81.9% (59)
Wang et al. [58] 13 30.8% (4) 7.7% (1) 61.5% (8) 15.4% (2)
Shang et al. [59] 307 (628 CT scans) 59.2% (372)
Vancheri et al. [60] 180 21.1% (38) 4.4% (8) 68.8% (124)
Fan et al. [61] 150 62% (93) 4% (6) 34% (51)
Luo et al. [62] 70 38.6% (27) 2.9% (2) 58.6% (41)
Chen et al. [63] 21 95.2% (20) 71.4% (15) 61.9% (13)
Cecconi et al. [64] 235 68.9% (162) 23.8% (56)
Iwasawa et al. [65] 6 100% (6) 100% (6) 83.3% (5/6)
Fu et al. [66] 55 32.7% (18) 16.4% (9) 14.5% (8) 52.7% (29) 38.2% (21)
Song et al. [32] 51 76.5% (39) 54.9% (28) 58.8% (30) 74.5% (38)
Chung et al. [67] 21 57.1% (12) 19% (4) 0 (0) 28.6% (6)
Pan et al. [31] 63 85.7% (54) 19% (12)
Xu et al. [68] 41 73.2% (30) 36.6% (15) 61% (25) 80.5% (33)
Wu et al. [69] 80 91.3% (73) 28.8% (23) 62.5% (50) 58.8% (47)
Shi et al. [29] 81 65.4% (53) 9.9% (8) 17.3% (14) 13.6% (11) 34.6% (28)
Xu et al. [70] 90 72.2% (65) 12.2% (11) 13.3% (12) 36.7% (33)
Liu et al. [71] 73 89% (65) 38.4% (28) 11% (8)
Zhou et al. [72] 62 61.3% (38) 25.8% (16) 1.6% (1) 35.5% (22)
Wang et al. [73] 1012 (917 CT scans) 94.1% (863) 5.9% (54)
Caruso et al. [74] 58 100% (58) 39.7% (23) 72.4% (42) 13.8% (8)
Himoto et al. [75] 6 66.7% (4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 33.3% (2)
Long et al. [1] 36 30.6% (11) 16.7% (6) 52.7% (19)
Han et al. [76] 17 (65 CT scans) 69.2% (65) 40% (26) 13.8% (9) 53.8% (35)
Ai et al. [4] 1014 (888 CT scans) 46.1% (409/888) 50.3% (447/888) 0.9% (8/888)
Pan et al. [8] 21 (82 CT scans) 73.2% (60) 23.2% (19) 63.4% (52)
Yang et al. [77] 149 (2376 segments)# 12.1% (287/2376) 7.2% (170/2376) 26.8% (637/2376)
Ding et al. [78] 112 (348 CT scans) 89.9% (313) 54.3% (189) 54.3% (189)