Table 2.
Delphi round | Rating Questiona Please assess the topics in terms of their relevance for an interprofessional teaching program. |
Consensusb |
---|---|---|
Group 2: Relevantc | ||
1 | Overview of methods in classical natural medicine | 94 |
1 | Clarification and explanation of CIM terms | 88 |
1 | Overview of methods in non-classical natural medicine | 88 |
1 | Overview of effects and interactions of selected CIM therapies | 84 |
Group 3: Partially relevantd | ||
1 | Legal issues relating to CIM therapies | 92 |
1 | Deepening the assessment of CIM evidence on the basis of selected studies | 92 |
2 | Placebo | 92 |
2 | Motivation for the demand for CIM services in the population | 89 |
1 | Use of CIM therapies | 89 |
2 | CIM in guidelines: Information and critical reflection | 89 |
2 | Motives and reasons for using CIM therapies | 87 |
1 | Supply structures and service providers | 86 |
2 | Health of health professionals, resilience and burn-out prevention | 81 |
1 | Overview of CIM databases and literature search via the Internet | 80 |
Group 4: Not relevante | ||
2 | Obstacles to and opportunities for using CIM from a provider perspective | 78 |
1 | Historical and philosophical backgrounds of CIM therapy | 77 |
Note. Results from the first (n = 50) and second (n = 40) Delphi-rounds. aSeven-point Likert scale (7 = very relevant, 1 = not at all relevant); bPercentage of ratings on Likert scale 5–7 in Group 2, and Likert scale 4–7 in Group 3 and 4; cTopics are assigned to Group 2 if at least 80% of the respondents gave a rating of 5–7 on the Likert scale; dTopics are assigned to group 3 if at least 80% of respondents gave a rating of 4–7 on the Likert scale; 5eTopics are assigned to group 4 if < 80% of respondents gave a rating of 4–7 on the Likert scale