Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 16;21:77. doi: 10.1186/s40360-020-00456-9

Table 1.

Pharmacokinetic parameters of imatinib in different groups

Parameter (unit)
Cmax (ng/mL) tmax (h) t0.5 (h) AUC0 (ng.h/mL) MRT (h) Vz/F (mL/kg) CL/F (mL/h/kg)
Imatinib only 6399.6 ± 3162.8 4.8 ± 2.3 6.2 ± 0.8 105,160.8 ± 75,643.2 11.1 ± 4.8 6.1 × 10− 3 ± 7.8 × 10− 3 0.6 × 10− 3 ± 0.7 × 10− 3
Imatinib + KTZ 2320.5* ± 448.8 13.5 ± 11.0 5.9 ± 0.8 52,747.1 ± 9652.7 17.5 ± 5.4 5.0 × 10− 3 ± 1.4 × 10− 3 0.6 × 10− 3 ± 0.1 × 10− 3
Imatinib + l-GS 5153.2 ± 1902.4 3.7 ± 0.5 5.7 ± 0.2 59,233.8 ± 15,601.1 7.4 ± 0.5 4.4 × 10− 3 ± 1.3 × 10− 3 0.5 × 10− 3 ± 0.2 × 10− 3
Imatinib + h-GS 2487.3* ± 1141.8 4.8 ± 1.8 5.2* ± 0.6 29,229.5* ± 10,979.2 7.7 ± 1.0 9.0 × 10− 3 ± 4.4 × 10− 3 1.2 × 10− 3 ± 0.4 × 10− 3
Imatinib + l-GT 2972.3* ± 1686.6 5.5 ± 2.2 5.0* ± 0.3 38,387.3* ± 17,570.8 9.8 ± 2.8 6.5 × 10− 3 ± 2.5 × 10− 3 0.9 × 10− 3 ± 0.4 × 10− 3
Imatinib + h-GT 3225.6* ± 611.7 4.5 ± 2.2 5.2* ± 0.6 42,764.2 ± 6215.1 8.5 ± 1.6 5.4 × 10−3 ± 1.1 × 10− 3 0.7 × 10− 3 ± 0.1 × 10− 3
Imatinib + l-GS and l-GT 9403.7†‡ ± 1500.3 4.7 ± 2.0 6.3†‡ ± 0.3 151,343.8†‡ ± 27,244.5 12.8 ± 2.9 1.8 × 10–3 ± 0.3 × 10− 3 0.2 × 10− 3 ± 0.0
Imatinib + h-GS and h-GT 3711.8# ± 2546.6 5.0 ± 2.7 4.8*# ± 0.7 50,340.5# ± 34,035.6 7.7# ± 0.6 8.2 × 10−3 ± 7.6 × 10− 3 1.3 × 10− 3 ± 1.3 × 10− 3

Pharmacokinetic parameters of imatinib after imatinib (30 mg/kg) administration alone (control), with ketoconazole (KTZ; 75 mg/kg), with a single low dose of grape seed (GS) or green tea (GT) extracts (l-GS or l-GT; 50 mg/kg), with a single high dose of GS or GT extracts (l-GS or l-GT; 100 mg/kg), or with a single co-administered low dose of both GS and GT extracts, or with a single co-administered high dose of both GS and GT extracts. Data: mean ± SD (n = 5–6)

*p-value < 0.05, compared to control (i.e. imatinib only)

#p-value < 0.05, when compared to the low dose of each designated group

p-value < 0.05, when “imatinib+ l-GS and l-GT” group is compared to l-GS group

p-value < 0.05, when “Imatinib+ l-GS and l-GT” group is compared to l-GT group