Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 16;20:472. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01864-6

Table 4.

Non-automatic hierarchical regression analysis with mood as dependent variable depression

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
B SE(B) β B SE(B) β B SE(B) β
Age .012 .005 .15* .011 .005 .13 .01 .005 .12*
Sex (0 = male) .26 .08 .22** .26 .08 .22** .27 .07 .22***
Education (0 = low) −.08 .07 −.06 −.06 .07 −.05 −.04 .07 −.03
Marital Status (0 = no partner) −.28 .08 −.23*** −.27 .08 −.22** −.18 .08 −.14*
Religious engagement (0 = no) −.08 .09 −.05 −.08 .10 −.05 −.10 .09 −.07

Social Disconnectedness

(Lubben Scale)

.14 (−.007) .09 (.006) .10 (−.07) −.01 (.001) .09 (.006) −.009 (.01)
Perceived isolation .39 (.36) .06 (.06)

.37***

(.36***)

R2 (R2 adj.) .17 (.15) .17 (.16) .29 (.28)
F for change in R2 (5265) = 10.61*** (1264) = .13 (1263) = 44.54***
F (5265) = 10.62*** (6264) = 9.28*** (7263) = 15.63***

Between brackets results from the HRA when the Lubben scale was considered as independent variable

* p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001. 287 < df < 304