Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 9;9:e62039. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62039

Table 1. Comparison of ligand activation of wildtype and mutant mTRPV1 channels by capaicin analogs.

Cap Cap-1 Cap+1
EC50 (µM) K N EC50 (µM) K N EC50 (µM) K N
WT 0.14 ± 0.01 1.82 ± 0.22 4 0.10 ± 0.01 1.20 ± 0.05 3 4.31 ± 0.23* 1.44 ± 0.11 4
T551V 1.56 ± 0.20 1.74 ± 0.13 5 9.13 ± 1.10*‡ 1.83 ± 0.31 5 70.12 ± 7.74 1.71 ± 0.10 8
E571A 1.53 ± 0.10 1.86 ± 0.07 4 19.31 ± 0.22*‡ 2.01 ± 0.02 6 31.43 ± 0.02 1.84 ± 0.11 6
I574A 0.22 ± 0.02 1.41 ± 0.12 3 2.80 ± 0.11*‡ 1.35 ± 0.23 7 10.73 ± 0.33 1.98 ± 0.12 5
T671S 0.05 ± 0.06 0.87 ± 0.11 3 22.80 ± 0.40*‡ 4.94 ± 0.30 3 35.29 ± 1.19 3.16 ± 0.45 3
Y512F 1.12 ± 0.17 1.35 ± 0.08 4 25.18 ± 1.18*‡ 2.68 ± 0.34 3 99.48 ± 6.82 1.46 ± 0.17 3

* Compared to Capsaicin (Cap).

Compared to WT Cap.

Compared to WT Cap-1.

§Compared to WT Cap+1.

EC50, half maximal effective concentration; K, Hill coefficient; N, number of patches.