Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 17;8(12):E1782–E1794. doi: 10.1055/a-1264-7511

Table 4. EUS-IBD versus percutaneous biliary drainage for patients with proximal stenosis or post-surgical anatomy.

Variable EUS-IBD (N = 45) PTBD (N = 45) P value
Matched variables
Proportion of malignant indication, n (%) 40 (88.9 %) 40 (88.9 %) 1
Level of the stenosis, n (%) 1
Anastomotic 15 (33.3 %) 15 (33.3 %)
Hilar/Intrahepatic 30 (66.7 %) 30 (66.7 %)
“Disconnected ductal system”, n (%) 26 (57.8 %) 26 (57.8 %) 1
Age [IQR], years 67 [60.5 – 76] 67 [62.3 – 74.5] 0.96
Other Variables
Male sex 23 (51.1 %) 30 (66.7 %) 0.1
Previous failed ERCP 18 (40 %) 18 (40 %) 1
Previous biliary drainage 17 (38.6 %) 8 (17.8 %) 0.03 1
Median bilirubin [IQR], mg/dl 5.1 [2.6 – 10.2] 8.3 [2.9 – 13.3] 0.2
Efficacy
Technical success, n (%) 42 (93.3 %) 44 (97.8 %) 0.31
Available FU N = 39 N = 44
Clinical success, n (%) 38 (97.4 %) 35 (79.5 %) 0.01 1
Median bilirubin decrease [IQR], mg/dL 2 2.6 [1.2 – 5.2] (N = 33) 4.2 [0.9 – 7] (N = 39) 0.64
Time to bilirubin decrease [IQR], days 2 7 [5 – 11] 6 [3 – 16] 0.44
Bilirubin decrease ≥ 25 %, n (%) 2 30 /33 (90.9 %) 31 /39 (79.5 %) 0.18
Bilirubin decrease ≥ 50 %, n (%) 2 18 /33 (54.5 %) 20 /39 (51.3 %) 0.78
Procedural time [IQR], minutes 35 [24.8 – 60.3] 45 [28.5 – 69.5] 0.23
Median hospital stay [IQR], days 7.5 [2 – 10] (N = 34) 11.5 [7 – 21.5] (N = 44) 0.01 1
Safety 0.004 1
No post-procedural event, n (%) 29 (64.4 %) 14 (31.1 %)
Mild post-procedural pain, n (%) 8 (17.8 %) 20 (44.4 %)
Adverse events, n (%) 8 (17.8 %) 11 (24.4 %)
Severe adverse events, n (%) 1 (2.2 %) 0 (0 %) 0.32
Follow-up
Stent dysfunction, n (%) 3 6 /38 (15.8 %) 15 /35 (42.9 %) 0.01 1
Median time to dysfunction [IQR], days 118 [77 – 196] 81 [20 – 157] 0.31 4
Median number of reinterventions [IQR] 0 [0 – 0] 1 [0.25 – 3], < 0.0001 1
Median post-procedural survival (95 %CI) 5 , days 91 (95 %CI 50 – 168) 119 (95 %CI 77 – 250) 0.61 5

EUS-IBD, endoscopic ultrasound-guided intrahepatic biliary drainage; PTBD, percutaneous biliary drainage; IQR, interquartile range; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

1

Statistically significant

2

Per-protocol; among patients with available data and pre-procedural elevation

3

Per-protocol; among patients with clinical success and available follow-up

4

N differences in dysfunction-free survival at log-rank test ( P  = 0.56)

5

Based on the log-rank test at Kaplan-Meier statistics.