Table 1.
Table summarizing the advantages and limitations of the described small-scale systems.
| Device | Surface area (cm2) | Cell densities (ml−1) | Features | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-Flask | 25–225 | 1 × 105 | • Low cost • Easy to use • Easy cell adaption • No special extra equipment required |
• Scaling-out can be labor intensive • Inconsistency |
| Multi-layer flask | 525–18,000 | 1 × 105 | • Increased surface area compared to T-Flask • All layers are passaged at once |
• Increasing in layers numbers impact in the difficult to handle it • Heterogeneity within different layers |
| Roller bottle | 850–1,700 | 1 × 105 | • Rotation provides better distribution of nutrients and oxygen • Require less media compared to planar flasks |
• Scaling-out can be labor intensive • Require extra setup to roll bottles. |
| Spinner flasks associated with microcarriers | 380/g | 1.7 × 106 | • Improved surface and cell yield • Homogeneous mass transfer • Relatively low-cost • Optimization prior to industrial scale-up in suspension |
• Shear stress can be harmful to cells • Require optimization with cell line and microcarriers |