Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 17;11:5856. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19731-8

Fig. 3. CO2 electroreduction performance in the presence of NO2 and N2O.

Fig. 3

CO2 electroreduction Faradaic efficiency, excluding hydrogen Faradaic efficiency, vs. time with the introduction of (a) 0.83% NO2 (yellow) and (b) 0.83% N2O (blue) on Cu, Ag, and Sn catalysts at a constant current density of 100 mA cm−2 in 1 M KHCO3 for 3 h. Gas feeds were 83.3% CO2 and 16.7% Ar, and 83.3% CO2 and 15.87% Ar with 0.83% NO2 or 0.83% N2O. NO2 and N2O were introduced at t = 0.5 h for 0.5 h. Corresponding Faradaic efficiencies are provided in Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7, and Supplementary Tables 712. (c) Loss in Faradaic efficiency during CO2 electroreduction from the introduction of 0.83% NO, 0.83% NO2, and 0.83% N2O on Cu, Ag, and Sn catalysts. Corresponding Faradaic efficiencies are provided in Supplementary Table 13. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent measurements.