Skip to main content
. 2020 May 20;6(2):177–192. doi: 10.1007/s41030-020-00120-x

Table 2.

Clinical trials of nebulizers vs. inhalers that included patient-reported outcomes

First author, year Study type Sample and comparison Study findings
Jenkins, 1987 [39] 8-week crossover trial

19 with stable chronic airflow limitation (number with COPD not stated)

Albuterol via pMDI vs. nebulizer

No statistical difference in daily peak expiratory flow (PEFR), severity of symptoms, extra bronchodilator use, or exercise tolerance

All patients attributed an improvement in their symptoms to the nebulizers

O’Driscoll, 1992 [40] Clinical trial of usual inhaler treatment followed by nebulizer treatment 34 with COPD Approximately half of patients who remained breathless despite receiving bronchodilators delivered by pMDIs or DPIs derived additional benefits from home nebulizer use; the majority of patients with COPD in this study chose to remain on nebulizers for long-term therapy
Balzano, 2000 [18] 2-week crossover trial

12 with COPD, 8 with asthma (combined in analyses)

Multidrug combination of 600 vs. 1875 μg of albuterol, 120 vs. 375 μg of ipratropium bromide, and 1000 vs. 3000 μg of flunisolide via pMDI and nebulizer, respectively

A 19% greater change in FEV1 after treatment with nebulizers compared with inhalers was not statistically significant

The majority (75%) of participants considered treatment more effective with nebulizers than with inhalers

Tashkin, 2007 [41] 12-week randomized clinical trial of patients comparing inhalers, nebulizers, and concomitant therapy

126 with COPD

Albuterol plus ipratropium via nebulizer, inhaler, or both

Nebulizers showed better patient-reported outcomes including questionnaire symptoms and quality of life; peak flow and FEV1 showed no significant differences; concomitant therapy was better than either alone
Brophy, 2008 [42] Crossover trial

25 with COPD

120 mcg ipratropium bromide and 600 mcg of albuterol via pMDI with spacer vs. 500 mcg ipratropium bromide and 2.5 mg albuterol via nebulizer

No statistical difference in measures of lung function, 6-min walk distance, breathlessness score, or qualify of life score

60% of patients reported a preference for nebulizers