Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;21:115. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00559-2

Table 2.

Description of clinical ethics committees (n = 109)

n (%)
Involved in any clinical ethics/medical ethics/bioethics organisations or institutions?
 Yes 79 (72.5)
 No 30 (27.5)
Do you have an established clinical ethics committee/healthcare ethics service at your institution/organisation?
 Yes 16 (14.7)
 No 93 (85.3)
*Members on the committee?
 0–5 1 (6.3)
 6–10 9 (56.3)
 11–15 5 (31.3)
 16–20 1 (6.3)
*Disciplines represented by CEC members (more than one option to choose)
 Law 9 (60)
 Bioethics 8 (53.3)
 Social sciences 7 (46.7)
 Health sciences 13 (86.7)
 Community 3 (20)
 Religious 6 (40)
 Management 6 (40)
*Frequency of the committee having scheduled meetings
 Weekly 1 (6.3)
 Monthly 6 (37.5)
 Quarterly 7 (43.8)
 Annually 0
 Other 2 (12.5)
*Frequency of the committee meeting for ad hoc consultations (when an urgent dilemma arises)
 Less than 10 times a year 12 (75)
 Between 10 and 20 times a year 3 (18.8)
 Between 21 and 30 times a year 0
 Other 1 (6.3)
*Typical problems referred to the committee (more than one option to choose)
 Treatment declined (including Jehovah’s witnesses) 6 (37.5)
 Withdrawal of life support 5 (31.3)
 Termination of pregnancy 4 (25)
 Consent 11 (68.8)
 Paediatrics 6 (37.5)
 HIV related 5 (31.3)
 Social media use 1 (6.3)
 Innovative treatment 8 (50)
 Traditional treatment 4 (25)
 Other 5 (31.3)
Constraints to developing a CEC (more than one option to choose)
 Limited resources 31 (36.9)
 Understaffed 22 (26.2)
 Lack of training 46 (54.8)
 Other 40 (47.6)

*Represent the number of participants that indicated that they have CECs