Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;10:579619. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.579619

Table 3.

Results of radiomics nomogram, radiomics signature, and the clinical model predictive ability for distinguishing between aggressive ccRCC and non-aggressive ccRCC.

Variables AUC(95% CI) Sensitivity* Specificity* Accuracy*
Clinical model Training cohort 0.86(0.78–0.94) 74.3(26/35) 86.7(72/83) 83.1(98/118)
Validation cohort 0.90(0.80–0.99) 60.0(9/15) 91.4(32/35) 82.0(41/50)
Radiomics signature Training cohort 0.86(0.79–0.92) 88.6(31/35) 77.1(64/83) 80.5(95/118)
Validation cohort 0.85(0.73–0.97) 73.3(11/15) 82.9(29/35) 80.0(40/50)
Radiomics nomogram Training cohort 0.91(0.86–0.97) 88.6(31/35) 81.9(68/83) 83.9(99/118)
Validation cohort 0.92(0.85–0.99) 100.0(15/15) 77.1(27/35) 84.0(42/50)

CI, confidence interval.

*Numbers in parentheses were used to calculate percentages.