Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;10:578763. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.578763

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of demographic and clinicopathological prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival in 488 patients with BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), January 2007 to December 2015.

Characteristics Variables Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P
Type of treatment LR vs TACE+LR 1.44 (1.17–1.76) 0.001 1.55 (1.26–1.91) <0.001
Age, years >60 vs. ≤60 0.97 (0.75–1.25) 0.80
Sex Male vs. female 0.85 (0.60–1.20) 0.85
Largest HCC tumor diameter, cm ≥10 vs. < 10 1.51 (1.21–1.88) <0.001 1.39 (1.11–1.75) 0.005
HCC tumors, n >3 vs. ≤3 3.43 (2.73–4.32) <0.001 2.98 (2.35–3.79) <0.001
Portal hypertensiona Yes vs. no 1.00 (0.66–1.53) 0.99
Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), ng/mL >400 vs. ≤400 1.35 (1.10–1.65) 0.004 NS 0.12
Type of hepatectomyb Non-anatomical vs. anatomical 1.31 (1.05–1.64) 0.02 NS 0.09
Resection marginc, cm >1 vs. ≤1 0.97 (0.74–1.27) 0.83
Tumor encapsulationd Yes vs. no 0.86 (0.70–1.07) 0.18
Microscopic vascular
Invasione
Yes vs. no 1.79 (1.45–2.21) <0.001 1.45 (1.16–1.81) 0.001
Cirrhosise Yes vs. no 1.91 (1.55–2.36) <0.001 1.74 (1.41–2.15) <0.001
Intraoperative blood transfusion Yes vs. no 0.92 (0.74–1.27) 0.83

aPortal hypertension defined preoperatively as esophageal varices and/or splenomegaly on imaging studies combined with a decreased platelet count [100 × 103/μL or less]).

bDetermined by surgeon intraoperatively, anatomical approach based on the Brisbane 2000 nomenclature of liver anatomy, whereas non-anatomical approach consisted of wedge or limited resection.

cBased on intraoperative surgeon estimation.

dBased on intraoperative surgeon description of tumor appearing encapsulated or infiltrating (not encapsulated).

eBased on postoperative histopathology report.

BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; CI, confidence interval; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; LR, liver resection (hepatectomy); NS, not significant.

Bold values provided in this table was that P value < 0.05, there was significant difference between the two groups.